icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
28 May, 2020 21:11

Disgrace! AOC & Pelosi lash out at Facebook’s Zuckerberg over hesitance to police social media speech like Twitter

Disgrace! AOC & Pelosi lash out at Facebook’s Zuckerberg over hesitance to police social media speech like Twitter

Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez targeted Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg for disagreeing with Twitter fact-checking Donald Trump, saying social media platforms are not “the arbiter of truth.”

House Speaker Pelosi slammed Zuckerberg’s disagreement with Twitter over fact-checking a tweet from the president linking mail-in voting to fraud as a “disgrace” in a Thursday press conference and accused the Facebook founder of “catering” to the current administration out of fear.

“As far as the platforms are concerned, they want two things from the federal government, no regulation and no taxes,” she said. “So they cater to the Trump administration all the time. I think Mark Zuckerberg’s statement was a disgrace.”

New York Congresswoman Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez not surprisingly took things a step further, claiming Facebook relies on “white supremacists and disinformation peddlers” to be “successful.”

“[Zuckerberg]  is worried that Facebook’s PR operation is falling apart as it’s exposed that their platform relies on white supremacists & disinformation peddlers to be successful,” she tweeted.

In his Wednesday interview, Zuckerberg tried to distance his company from Twitter when asked about the tweet by the president being “fact-checked.”

“We have a different policy than Twitter on this. I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,” he said. “I think in general, private companies probably shouldn’t be — especially these platform companies — shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.”

Also on rt.com ‘Election process will become badly tainted & laughingstock’: Trump doubles down on mail-in voting in heated tweet

Despite not seeing Facebook as an “arbiter of truth,” the company has come under fire numerous times for banning users over their speech. Conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones and David Icke have been kicked off the platform, while other conservatives have consistently complained of bias.

The company’s role in policing speech was previously called into question in Capitol Hill hearings where Zuckerberg did not seem to have such stringent views on regulating speech, which the company does to this day. Zuckerberg promised at the time to do more to combat fake news and alleged disinformation campaigns from foreign countries.

President Trump has meanwhile passed an executive order that could alter the legal projections big tech companies have with Section 230, which allows them legal immunity from litigation stemming from liability for what is posted to their sites. 

Also on rt.com Trump signs social media executive order challenging platforms' liability protections

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Podcasts
0:00
23:13
0:00
25:0