'Who did he have sex with?' Liberal media take digs at Fox host Hannity over Trump lawyer link
After Cohen’s office was raided by FBI agents last week and a trove of private communications was seized, Federal Judge Kimba Wood forced Cohen to reveal the names of his clients on Monday, one of whom was Hannity.
Hannity denied any involvement with Cohen, beyond “occasionally” asking for his input in legal discussions. Hannity has been covering the story surrounding Cohen on his Fox News show, leading to concerns about a conflict of interest.
Michael Cohen has never represented me in any matter. I never retained him, received an invoice, or paid legal fees. I have occasionally had brief discussions with him about legal questions about which I wanted his input and perspective.— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) April 16, 2018
I assumed those conversations were confidential, but to be absolutely clear they never involved any matter between me and a third-party.— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) April 16, 2018
Hannity said on his radio show on Monday that he "may have" handed Cohen $10 and said: “I want privilege to cover me about this conversation."
CNN was first out of the gate to land a dig on the conservative heavyweight, running a segment arguing that he should never have enjoyed lawyer-client privilege. Legal analyst Carrie Cordero said that, unless Cohen was formally retained, Hannity should never have expected confidentiality.
"If the statements that I saw from Hannity yesterday are accurate statements, I don't think it looks like there is any legal privilege between" him and Michael Cohen, says legal analyst @CarrieCorderohttps://t.co/hh6RVh0Lp9pic.twitter.com/FGA5w7lZVW— New Day (@NewDay) April 17, 2018
Over several segments that followed, the network attacked Hannity for working with Cohen, for not disclosing this to his viewers, and for calling his show “news.”
"I think he's a really interesting phenomenon," says @brianstelter of Sean Hannity. "He does blur these lines. He says he's not a journalist, he says journalism is dead, and yet he calls his show real news and says he has anonymous sources, so he tries to have it both ways" pic.twitter.com/2uDfQLtvJe— New Day (@NewDay) April 17, 2018
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow said that she was “struggling not to laugh” after hearing the court revelation, and described the situation as “just nuts.” Maddow has been a constant critic of the president and his team, and drew 4.1 million viewers when she released Trump’s tax returns live on air last year. In a stunning anticlimax, the documents revealed that Trump had properly paid his taxes.
Late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel was next to pile on Hannity, wondering what kind of legal advice Hannity would need that didn’t involve a third party "unless, maybe Sean Hannity was thinking about suing himself?"
Kimmel and Hannity had feuded publicly in recent weeks. After Hannity compared Kimmel to Harvey Weinstein for a sketch broadcast several years ago; Kimmel shot back, calling Hannity an “ass clown,” and asking “Does Trump prefer you on bottom?” Kimmel was later forced to apologize for these remarks after an outcry from the gay community.
Predictably, Kimmel’s fellow late-night liberal Stephen Colbert waded into the fray, toasting the revelation that Hannity was Cohen’s client with a glass of wine. “This is crazy,” Colbert told his audience. “Cohen only has two other clients, and all he does for them is pay off mistresses – which raises the obvious question: who did Sean Hannity have sex with?”
Ongoing troubles for the man who paid off Stormy Daniels... https://t.co/UHZuD6qfMD— Stephen Colbert (@StephenAtHome) April 17, 2018
Cohen previously paid porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 reportedly in an effort to keep her quiet about an alleged 2006 affair with Trump, while he also reportedly arranged a $1.6 million payout to a Playboy model who had become pregnant through her relationship with Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy, his other client.
Hannity’s Fox News colleague Tucker Carlson came to his defense on Monday, arguing that "who he hires as a lawyer and why is nobody's business… no judge has a right to violate his privacy or anybody else's. Those used to be the rules, but the rules have changed.
"Now maybe you hate Trump and you’re happy about that, but what are the rest of us losing in this process?” Carlson added. “Attorney-client privilege no longer means anything. Neither does privacy or public reputation or fairness.”
The Cohen revelations also angered Donald Trump, who saw the FBI raid on the lawyer’s office as another incident in a long witch-hunt against the president.
“Attorney Client privilege is now a thing of the past,” Trump tweeted after the raid on Cohen’s office. “I have many (too many!) lawyers and they are probably wondering when their offices, and even homes, are going to be raided with everything, including their phones and computers, taken. All lawyers are deflated and concerned!”
Attorney Client privilege is now a thing of the past. I have many (too many!) lawyers and they are probably wondering when their offices, and even homes, are going to be raided with everything, including their phones and computers, taken. All lawyers are deflated and concerned!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 15, 2018