icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
24 May, 2020 07:22

NYT includes MURDER VICTIM in controversial front page list of Covid-19 deaths

NYT includes MURDER VICTIM in controversial front page list of Covid-19 deaths

The New York Times has split the internet over a provocative front page spread of Covid-19 victims. The list itself has come under scrutiny, with at least one of the deaths found to have actually resulted from homicide.

As the US death toll approaches 100,000, the paper decided to print a “long, solemn list of people whose lives were lost to the coronavirus pandemic.” Instead of trying to fit tens of thousands of names on the front page, the New York Times chose to highlight a curated selection of obituaries from across the country.

The Times explained that the list of 1,000 people was designed to remind Americans that there are human faces behind the death toll – but pundits and readers were far from united in their reception of the piece.

Predictably, the front page spread sparked an avalanche of partisan finger-pointing. Some wondered aloud how many of the deceased had perished in nursing homes, and called out New York Governor Andrew Cuomo for sending Covid patients to stay in these high-risk facilities.

There was similar outrage directed at US President Donald Trump, who was lambasted by Democrats for golfing over the Memorial Day weekend.

However, the New York Times itself was not spared in the social media fracas. A former reporter for the paper, Alex Berenson, argued that his former employer had abandoned all sense of proportion, playing to emotions rather than putting the health crisis in context.

He also speculated that the list likely includes individuals who didn’t actually die from coronavirus – a hypothesis that was later proven to be correct. As it turns out, the sixth name on the list was actually a murder victim. CNN’s Brian Stelter tweeted that a representative of the paper had confirmed the error and said that it would be removed for “later editions.”

The New York Times claims that the list was created by a researcher who “combed through various online sources online for obituaries and death notices with Covid-19 written as the cause of death.” However, the error raised doubts over the accuracy of the piece as a whole.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!