icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Funding priorities? If NASA ran Texas, its residents would not freeze, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson tells RT in half-joke

Funding priorities? If NASA ran Texas, its residents would not freeze, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson tells RT in half-joke
Existence of unresolved problems on Earth is no reason not to invest in fundamental research like space programs, renowned astrophysicist and science author Neil deGrasse Tyson told RT.

Tyson was challenged by Afshin Rattansi, the host of RT’s “Going Underground” program, to convince them that billions of US taxpayer dollars should be spent on projects like the James Webb Space Telescope or Mars exploration, considering that just recently people in Texas were literally freezing to death due to power outages amid a winter storm.

“Maybe the real answer should be that NASA should run Texas?” he responded in a half-joke. “If NASA can put a probe on Mars, they can run Texas in a way that people will not be without heat. I guarantee it.”

Asking about priorities is, of course, a legitimate and sensible line of inquiry, Tyson added. This is especially true for fundamental science like astrophysics, which offers no concrete material return on investment. He believes it is worth it.

He offered an analogy: Prehistoric people are sheltering inside a cave and telling a tribe member eager to go out and explore the outside world that he cannot do so while there are immediate cave problems.

“I try not to get into the weeds of funding priorities. Instead what I like to do is compel the electorate” with factual arguments, Tyson said. “If you really don’t want NASA – and it’s a representative democracy – OK. But I want you to vote that way from an informed platform.”

The interview was dedicated to Tyson’s latest book, “Cosmic Queries”. He spoke about how his field of scientific expertise has the “coolest names” for things, his views about billionaires shaping the society and how humans have tools to deal with a possible asteroid disaster that dinosaurs didn’t have in their time – namely big brains, opposing thumbs and space programs.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.

Podcasts