icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Schrodinger’s indictment? US prosecutors oppose unsealing presumably nonexistent Assange charges

Schrodinger’s indictment? US prosecutors oppose unsealing presumably nonexistent Assange charges
Federal prosecutors are trying to contain the damage after a filing error disclosed the existence of a sealed indictment against Julian Assange, but their refusal to admit the charges exist lends the proceedings a Kafkaesque air.

Prosecutors informed US District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema that they oppose a group of journalists’ request to unseal any pending US indictment and refuse to acknowledge the existence of such an indictment in the first place – a situation that would be comical if it didn’t run entirely contrary to the American tradition of giving the accused a fair trial.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press applied earlier this month for the unsealing of court records relating to US charges against Assange, “including the docket and any criminal complaint, indictment, or other charging document.”

Also on rt.com ‘Last diplomat he knew’: Ecuador ousts London envoy, fuels rumors of Assange’s imminent eviction

An apparent copy-paste error earlier this month revealed the existence of a sealed indictment against Assange in the Eastern District of Virginia, substituting his name for that of another defendant in court filings. The slip indicated that Assistant US Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer wants the indictment kept sealed until such time as Assange can be arrested.

Given the friction between Assange and his hosts at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, that time may be approaching quickly. A new set of rules governing Assange’s stay in the Ecuadorian embassy in London stated that “budget cuts” going into effect on December 1 will compel him to pay for his own food, medical care, laundry, and related expenses. A lawsuit Assange filed against his host over the new restrictions, which include a ban on political speech and severe restrictions on visitors, was thrown out of court by an Ecuadorian judge last month.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Podcasts