Paul Manafort ‘guilty of crimes against fashion’ – but still no Russian collusion

Paul Manafort ‘guilty of crimes against fashion’ – but still no Russian collusion
With US mainstream media desperately trying to present Paul Manafort’s trial through the prism of ‘Russia collusion,’ one would expect evidence. But so far, the prosecution has proved only the lobbyist’s questionable taste.

Manafort is the first member of Donald Trump’s campaign team to be indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and brought to trial. While Mueller’s investigation set out to find evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia, Manafort is accused of bank and tax fraud, unrelated charges dating back to his work as a lobbyist for ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych over a decade ago.

Nevertheless, the mainstream media have been jumping for joy. Finally, Mueller gets a chance to put the Trump team on trial over Russia. Long before the trial began, the Washington Post wondered “Did Russia teach Paul Manafort all its dirty tricks?”

Back when Manafort was indicted late last year, CNN ran the headline ‘This is the week Russia got very real for Donald Trump.’ The New York Times declared ‘With Manafort, it really is about Russia, not Ukraine.’ ‘Bad day for Manafort, as judge points out his deep Russia ties,’ ran a headline from MSNBC earlier this summer.

Behind the headlines, however, lies a disturbing lack of collusion, and a lack of ties to Trump. The president’s name was not mentioned once during opening arguments on Tuesday, and all of the charges against Manafort predate his brief period on the Trump campaign team.

In the absence of any evidence of collusion, Mueller has sought to portray Manafort as a man who enriched himself while dodging his taxes, and one piece of evidence presented to the Virginia court on Wednesday was supposed to do just that: a $15,000 jacket “made from an ostrich.”

Prosecutors called on a men’s clothier to show the jacket and testify that Manafort bought it via international wire transfer. Already, Twitter has decided that the former campaign chair is guilty of having terrible taste.

Committed anti-Trumpers on Twitter have clung to the jacket as proof that Manafort is guilty...of something.

Prosecutors also showed off Manafort’s other questionable clothing choices, and revealed that he purchased a $21,000 watch and a $2 million house. He is accused of lying about his foreign lobbying income to get approved for bank loans in America.

To some observers, however, Manafort’s fashion crimes are trivial. After more than a year, and with no evidence of ‘Russian collusion’ in sight, one ostrich-skin jacket is not likely to topple the Trump presidency, and fashion crimes are still not an impeachable offense.

“All this document shows is that Mr. Manafort had a lavish lifestyle, he had a nice home with a pool and a gazebo — it’s not relevant,” Judge TS Ellis said on Wednesday.

As Mueller’s probe drags on, Manafort seem to be the first Trump campaign member who can afford a lengthy trial.

Former campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn were indicted and pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI, and Manafort’s business partner Rick Gates – indicted on similar charges to Manafort – struck a plea deal with Mueller.

None of their charges relate to ‘Russian Collusion.’

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Reporting what the mainstream media won’t: Follow RT’s Twitter account