UN report details shocking civilian death toll in Afghanistan
The 2017 annual report, titled “Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict,” gives a chilling assessment on the number of civilians killed by the ongoing conflict between the NATO-backed Afghan security forces and anti-government factions, such as Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) and the Taliban, emphasizing they were the primary causes of non-combatant deaths.
“Civilian casualties caused during ground engagements against Anti-Government Elements accounted for the majority – 53 per cent – of all civilian casualties attributed to Pro-Government Forces,” the report states.
More civilians were killed or injured by air strikes than in 2016, the UN report said. UNAMA “documented 631 civilian casualties (295 deaths and 336 injured) from aerial operations, a seven per cent increase compared to 2016, including an 18 per cent increase in deaths.”
Despite the findings, the report says that pro-government forces caused 2,108 casualties last year, significantly down from 2,731 in 2016. Conversely, anti-government forces caused 6,768 casualties in 2017, a slight decrease from 7,003 in 2016.
“Between 1 January and 31 December, UNAMA documented 10,453 civilian casualties (3,438 deaths and 7,015 injured), an overall decrease of nine per cent compared to 2016 and the first year-on-year decrease recorded by UNAMA since 2012,” the report states. “While the number of civilian deaths reduced by two per cent from 2016 and the number of civilians injured decreased by 11 per cent, the overall continuation of high numbers of civilian casualties underscores the enormous human cost of the ongoing armed conflict.”
Casualties caused by anti-government forces accounted for “65 percent of [total] civilian casualties, with combined IED tactics, mainly suicide and complex attacks, being the leading cause.”
While the Taliban continue to seize more territory from the government, civilian deaths can also be attributed to poorly trained military staff and rampant corruption.
Afghan security forces have been unable to cope with the rise in anti-government forces, such as the Taliban, and they are “troubled by poor leadership, high rates of attrition, and so-called ghost soldiers, who exist on paper only to collect pay for corrupt officers,” according to The New York Times.
In August 2017, US president Donald Trump laid out a new military strategy for Afghanistan, advocating “strategically applied force” to “create the conditions for a political process to achieve a lasting peace.” He also criticized Afghanistan and Pakistan as “safe havens” for terrorism and called for the 4,000 additional US troops to be deployed in the theatre.
A 2017 report was critical of the strategy, noting that problems were occurring among both Afghan security forces and the Taliban.
“Amid persistent problems within the Afghan security forces, momentum has been on the Taliban’s side. The Haqqani network, Islamic State, and other actors have contributed to the deterioration in security,” the Brookings Institution stated.
Nasir Khan Janjua, the national security advisor to Pakistani prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, stated that using a military approach to fight the Taliban would only lead to “prolonged agony” and would compound the suffering of Afghan citizens.
The war in Afghanistan, now called Operation Resolute Support, has been ongoing since October 7, 2001. The conflict has cost over $1 trillion dollars in addition to countless civilian lives.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!