icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
23 Jul, 2021 09:22

UK govt won’t search Hancock’s private emails despite admitting ex-health secretary used personal account for official work

UK govt won’t search Hancock’s private emails despite admitting ex-health secretary used personal account for official work

The British government has ruled out a review of former health secretary Matt Hancock’s private emails, amid reports that his use of a personal account hid records of much of his decision-making during the Covid crisis.

Downing Street has decided that an inspection of Hancock’s private email account was “neither necessary nor proportionate.”

However, the government has acknowledged that Hancock – who resigned last month after being caught on camera smooching with an aide, leading to allegations that he violated his marriage vows, as well as his own social distancing guidelines – had used his personal email to carry out official business. 

The move comes after the Good Law Project, a public advocacy group, argued that Hancock’s emails should be reviewed, following an April court decision which ordered Downing Street to disclose documents and correspondence relating to several ministers’ knowledge of a scheme that granted PPE contracts to suppliers with political links to the Tory government. 

Downing Street responded by arguing that it had already reviewed more than 1.4 million documents associated with Hancock and several other senior government officials in response to the court order, and found nothing to indicate that it would be “necessary” to review the ministers’ private emails. 

Good Law Project director Jo Maugham described the government’s position as “bizarre” and suggested that Downing Street was likely afraid of what it might find if Hancock’s private emails were searched. 

“We are left with the farcical situation of Government behaving like the three wise monkeys, declining even to look at what business private email accounts were used to conduct,” the charity organisation said in a separate statement. 

Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner was similarly outraged by the government’s “completely unacceptable” decision not to inspect Hancock’s private emails. 

She told the BBC that emails sent and received by current and former ministers “must be secured” for any future public inquiry into the handling of the Covid crisis. The Cabinet Office declined to comment on the matter.

A full audit of Hancock’s personal email account would shine a light on reports alleging that the ex-health secretary was highly secretive about how he approached decisions related to the pandemic. In an explosive report from late June, the Sunday Times alleged that Hancock had relied almost exclusively on his private email for making important decisions, including negotiating PPE contracts, organising the country’s test-and-trace programme and supervising the controversial strategy to move Covid patients into care homes in the early months of the health crisis. 

Also on rt.com Britain is broken, let down by authoritarian, lying leaders who have utter contempt for the people who elect them

According to the paper, Hancock did not even have an official email account and worked exclusively through a personal Gmail address. As a result, the government reportedly lacks a concise record of much of the ex-secretary’s decision-making that guided the UK’s response to the coronavirus outbreak.

Ministers are not barred from using private accounts to conduct their work, but current guidance calls for messages to be copied to Whitehall servers if they involve “substantive discussions or decisions generated in the course of conducting government business.”

Like this story? Share it with a friend!