icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
16 Jan, 2018 13:21

‘It’s time to move on’: William Hague says UKIP is irrelevant & should disband

‘It’s time to move on’: William Hague says UKIP is irrelevant & should disband

UKIP should do the “dignified thing” and disband, William Hague has said as the party plunges into a fresh crisis over the leader’s “racist” ex-girlfriend. The former Tory leader and UKIP have a history of conflict.

Writing in The Telegraph, Hague acknowledged the crucial role the party played in getting the UK out of the EU. But, as holding a referendum was the party’s sole purpose, it must realize it is now time for it to break up, he said.

“UKIP played a big role in changing the course of British and European history, but the only way to ensure the change they wanted really happens is to stand behind ministers who are faithfully trying to execute it,” Hague said.

“In the unlikely event of another sudden general election, Brexit might well depend on the Conservatives winning it. And in an election in a few years’ time, Brexit will have happened and arguing about its details will be academic.”

He even pens a mock resignation letter for UKIP. “For Henry Bolton's party, the best way to avert a long, fruitless and miserable battle for existence, always on the edge of solvency and only in the news for embarrassments, is to issue a statement that goes something like this:

“’In UKIP, we have achieved our objective of the British people voting to leave the European Union and their wishes being respected. Now is the time formally to suspend our activities and for each of us to contribute to politics in new ways or to leave it.

“’We emphasize, however, that should any doubt arise about withdrawal from the EU in the coming months, we will be ready to resume our campaigning with all the energy and support that would come from a failure to deliver the wishes of the people.’”

Hague has spent years dissing UKIP. In 2014, he called former Tory donor and multi-millionaire Arron Banks a “nobody” when he defected to UKIP ahead of the Conservative Party conference that year.

In response to Banks’ decision to support the euroskeptic party, Hague said: “I have never heard of him [Banks], so we are not going to get too upset about that.”

The comments cost Hague a high price. Wounded Banks then increased his donation to UKIP from £100,000 ($138,000) to £1 million ($1.38 million).

“I woke up this morning intending to donate £100,000 to UKIP and I understand Mr Hague called me a nobody,” Banks told the BBC at the time of the spat.

“So, in light of that and because I am a strong advocate of leaving the European Union, I have decided today to donate £1m to the party and not the £100,000 we originally agreed.”

Hague’s most-recent comments come amid reports of the party planning to oust current UKIP leader Henry Bolton after it emerged that his ex-girlfriend made racist comments about Prince Harry’s future wife, Meghan Markle.

Bolton’s former partner, Jo Marney, had sent texts saying the American TV star would “taint” the royal family, and that black people are ugly.

Following widespread backlash over the offensive comments, the UKIP leader said he had ended his relationship with Marney, who he claimed had been left distraught by the incident.

The party has had six leaders in the past 16 months - including Nigel Farage, who stepped in ad interim when Diane James stepped down after just 18 days.

Hague said: “When you have had so many leaders in a year and a half that you struggle to remember who they all were and why each of them quit, and are now having to think about getting a sixth or seventh one, the problem is not the leaders. There is a more fundamental issue.”

Dismissing claims that all leaders had resigned due to their incapability, he said: “It is because they do not know why they exist as a party any more, and cannot communicate a reason for it to the media, the voters, or possibly even themselves.

"The party is asking each of its leaders, good or bad, to do the impossible, and then blaming them for being unable to do it.”