Livingstone denies he blamed Chavez for not killing Venezuelan oligarchs to avoid crisis
Livingstone made his controversial comment while giving an interview to UK-based talkRADIO station on Thursday.
When asked about the situation in Venezuela, the politician said that late President Chavez should have eliminated all the elites in the country.
“Chavez …didn't kill all the oligarchs. There were about 200 families that control 80 percent of the wealth. He allowed them to live and carry on and I suspect a lot of them are using their power... to undermine Maduro,” he said.
His comments created quite a stir on social media, dividing the public. Some said that the Venezuelan crisis should be blamed solely on the government, while others claimed that the ex-London mayor “has a point.”
Later on Thursday, Livingstone retreated from his comments, saying that his words were misinterpreted.
“I have not said that Hugo Chavez should have killed anyone and nor would I ever advocate it. I even dispel this accusation in the very interview that is being extensively quoted,” Livingstone, who served as a mayor of London between 2000 and 2008, said.
He said that the point he was making was that Chávez “didn’t repress the former ruling elite in Venezuela.”
Please RT my statement on today's media misrepresentations - Venezuela requires serious discussion, not clickbait.https://t.co/YRZg3BdLNl— Ken Livingstone (@ken4london) August 3, 2017
“Many members of the former ruling elite have stayed in the country, seeking to overthrow elected presidents through unconstitutional and violent means [including the coup in 2002] ever since,” Livingston said in a statement published on his website.
The 2002 Venezuela coup, which saw Chavez briefly removed from power, was followed by allegations of US involvement. After the coup, Chavez asserted numerous times that US government officials knew about plans for the putsch and approved of them.
However, Washington strongly denied any involvement.
The fuss on social media over Livingstone’s remarks shows no sign of abating, however, with some people, who claimed to be Venezuelans, saying he is “misinterpreting” reality.
As a Venezuelan I found your comments a misrepresentation of our reality. We are not looking to overthrow anyone. We just want democracy— Manuel Tovar (@mentetransfuga) August 3, 2017
It is obvious that you know nothing about Venezuela. Better keep your mouth Shut— Juan Lison (@JRLison) August 3, 2017
Mr. Livingstone, you just don’t have any clue about our country. So please, keep your thoughts to yourself. Thanks.— Victor Rossetti (@RossettiFX) August 4, 2017
really don't know what's going on in Venezuela, come and live here so you can talk about it. I'm sure you'll change your mind.— Julio Borges Osorio (@JulBorg) August 3, 2017
Others accused him of “dark relationship” with Venezuelan authorities.
I am sure you know all of this but who knows what "dark" relationship you currently have with the Venezuelan regime.— Jorge Halabi (@jlhalabi) August 3, 2017
Venezuela has the right to run its own affairs. The USA and UK can't sort their own problems out but interfere, under duress from the USA— Kieran Brookes (@ronj14848) August 3, 2017
Some people called for him not to meddle in the affairs of the South American country.
Venezuela has nothing to do with us. Let them sort their own problems out.— Simon Legree (@ABC11330175) August 3, 2017
Livingstone has repeatedly voiced his support for President Maduro and his government. Asked by the Times earlier in August if he supports Maduro and the Bolivarian Revolution, the leftist political revival initiated by Chavez, Livingstone said: “Oh God, yes.”
On that occasion he also mentioned the “execution of the establishment elite.”
“Hugo Chavez did not execute the establishment elite; he allowed them to continue so they’re still there. I think there’s a lot of rumors they’ve been blocking the important food and medicines and things like that, because they control a lot of the companies,” he told the newspaper.