icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Minister dodges question on whether UK troops could fight in South Sudan to protect aid

Minister dodges question on whether UK troops could fight in South Sudan to protect aid
Britain’s development minister has refused to confirm whether 400 troops being deployed to Sudan will be used as a protection force to secure aid deliveries.

Priti Patel, who heads the Department for International Development (DFID), was pressed by Sky News on whether troops would be used to secure aid which might otherwise fall into the hands of warring factions.

Conflict has been ongoing between forces of the South Sudanese government and Sudan People's Liberation Movement-in-Opposition since 2013.

Asked if UK troops would secure aid, Patel said: "This is a combined effort so I think it's important to say we are working together at every single level.

"The humanitarian piece is absolutely crucial, it really is, but also we are sending troops over in a very important role.

"I think it's fair to acknowledge the role that they are going to be playing is a strategic role and it's a very important one but the UK's effort is a combined effort."

Pressed again on whether UK soldiers would take up an active role on protecting aid, Patel said they would be there as part of an “integrated” approach.

The next deployment of up to 400 troops will be mostly of military engineers and is likely to include a force protection element to guard embassies and other UK installations and personnel.

When the deployment was announced in September 2015, then-Prime Minister David Cameron insisted that the role would not involve combat.

In an apparent effort to allay the fears of voters, Cameron said the security of personnel would be of paramount concern.

But let me stress, we all want to see all the right force-protection arrangements in place but we should be playing a part in this.

What happens in Somalia, if it’s a good outcome, it’s good for Britain, it means less terrorism, less migration, less piracy; ditto South Sudan,” Cameron claimed, adding it is “absolutely vital that the international community works together to shore up stability in Africa.

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.