icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
2 Aug, 2016 15:43

Celebrities accuse BP of exploiting the arts

Celebrities accuse BP of exploiting the arts

Artists, campaigners and scientists have signed a letter slamming oil giant BP’s sponsorship of four of Britain’s leading cultural institutions, calling the deals “outdated and unacceptable.”

It comes after BP’s announcement last week that it would invest £7.5 million (about US$10 million) over five years in the British Museum, Royal Opera House, Royal Shakespeare Company and National Portrait Gallery.

The letter, organized by Art Not Oil and published in the Times, says BP uses arts sponsorship to develop its interests in oil extraction, which must be reduced to tackle climate change.

Among the letter’s 214 signatories is the Oscar-winning actor Mark Rylance, who was previously artistic director of Shakespeare’s Globe theatre and played the lead in Steven Spielberg’s the BFG.

It is also signed by actor Ezra Miller, artist Conrad Atkinson, composer Matthew Herbert, author Naomi Klein and environmentalist Jonathon Porritt.

The letter says: “We cannot afford another five years of BP-branded culture. We believe museums, theatres and galleries are public institutions that must play a positive role in taking urgent climate change action and defending human rights.

“If the world is to avoid rapid and devastating climate change in the coming decades, most of the oil on BP’s books cannot be burned. Meanwhile, the company continues acting in defiance of the Paris agreement on climate change, and harming lives every day.”

The letter adds that it has become cheaper for BP to get its brand on major museums and theaters – just £375,000 a year for each institution on average – than the cost of a short billboard campaign.

“We know now that BP sponsorship comes with strings attached,” the letter says.

“A recent report from the Art Not Oil coalition revealed how BP leant on the British Museum to hold events timed with BP’s bid for drilling licences in Mexico.”

Earlier this year, BP ended its 26-year sponsorship of the Tate and its 34-year sponsorship of the Edinburgh International Festival, blaming the “extremely challenging business environment,” despite years of protests against the deals.

Last summer climate activists held a 25-hour protest in the Turbine Hall of the Tate Modern, writing charcoal messages on the floor after a standoff with museum officials.

In November, the Liberate Tate campaigners occupied Tate Britain, where they tattooed their skin with the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during the year of their birth.

The British Museum, National Portrait Gallery, Royal Opera House and Royal Shakespeare Company have also seen creative demonstrations against their relationships with BP.

In May, Greenpeace activists scaled the columns of the British Museum in London to protest against BP’s sponsorship of a new ‘Sunken Cities’ exhibition.