icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

​‘Criminalizing homelessness’: Anger against Hackney Council’s rough sleeping ban grows

​‘Criminalizing homelessness’: Anger against Hackney Council’s rough sleeping ban grows
London’s Hackney Council has been accused of “criminalizing homelessness” after announcing a system of fines intended to tackle anti-social behavior, including rough sleeping and begging.

Government figures show 6,508 people slept rough in London last year.

Homeless people found begging in the streets of Hackney could be issued a £100 on-the-spot fine with a potential court charge of £1,000 under the new Public Space Protection Order (PSPO).

The council says the Protection Order is being put in place to tackle persistent “anti-social behavior” such as begging, rough sleeping in “hot spots” and street drinking.

HACKNEY COUNCIL: Stop criminalising Hackney's rough sleepers https://t.co/3z7hmiTt4K via @UKChange PLEASE SIGN #disgrace#Homeless

— TeeMac (@LadyTinkerbella) June 3, 2015

However it is still unclear how the council will collect the money from rough sleepers.

Several organizations have spoken out and launched a petition against the council’s order.

Commenting on the order, Heather Kennedy from campaign group Digs said the council’s “criminalization” of homeless people has angered Hackney residents.

[A] large number of people” are planning to protest against the PSPO, she told the Hackney Times.

The council “failed to support residents in housing need … in the middle of a housing crisis,” she said.

We will not rest until the criminalization of homelessness in our borough is overturned,” she added.

READ MORE: Single homeless people must be supported by local govt, Supreme Court rules

Hackney Community Law Centre also released a statement pleading with the council to consider amending the order.

Its chairman, Ian Rathbone, said the order would not stop the homeless from sleeping rough, merely “force them to sleep rough elsewhere.”

Hackney Deputy Mayor Sophie Linden insists the order was put forward so the borough could see a reduction in anti-social behavior that affects the safety and wellbeing of residents.

Enforcement will always be a last resort and only used for those who continue to sleep rough,” she told the Hackney Times.

Commenting on the nature of the order, Homeless Link Director of Policy and Communications Jacqui McCluskey told RT she “doesn’t think it’s right” to criminalize homelessness.

READ MORE: UK inaction on housing crisis breaches human rights, say charities

The measures brought forward by the Hackney Council “do nothing to tackle the causes of homelessness and rough sleeping,” she added.

The main focus should be on “preventing people from becoming homeless” and ensuring those who are receive the “appropriate support and accommodation in place to help them move on from homelessness for good.”

Condemning the order, Jon Sparkes, chief executive of homelessness charity Crisis, said plans to ban and criminalize rough sleeping will be “counter-productive” and only make it harder to access the support people need to get off the streets for good.

@FocusE15 Please let Hackney Council know that criminalising homeless people is #NotFineWithUs & share this. pic.twitter.com/4voPN9kYwj

— Digs (@Hackney_renters) June 2, 2015

However, Thames Reach Communications Manager Mike Nicholas argues the PSPO in Hackney is being used to specifically tackle begging, which he linked to heroin, street drinking and crack cocaine use rather than homelessness.

Nicholas told the Hackney Times that the aim of the order was to help those on the streets who previously had refused to engage with support services to “break the cycle.”

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.