icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Western media stripped Team Russia of presumption of innocence prior to IOC decision (VIDEO)

Western media stripped Team Russia of presumption of innocence prior to IOC decision (VIDEO)
The International Olympic Committee ruled on Sunday that there will be no blanket ban on Russia’s team from the Rio Olympics, but prior to the decision some Western media outlets teamed up in a call to strip the Russian team of its right to compete.

The IOC said on Sunday that the respective International Sports Federations would decide on whether Russian athletes can go to the Olympics.

“I think this way we have balance on the line and the desire and need to collective responsibility versus the right to individual justice of every individual athlete,” IOC chief Thomas Bach stated following the decision.

However, the Western media’s coverage of the case had already turned into a chorus calling for a blanket ban on Team Russia, with many renowned outlets picking sides before the IOC decision was even announced.

“No place in Rio for cheats,” read the headline of a July 19 article that appeared in the Editorial section of  the UK’s The Guardian a day after the World Anti-Doping Agency had issued its latest report, authored by Canadian lawyer Richard Mclaren, that alleged agencies in the Russian government had covered for doping. The newspaper claimed that “if Russia is not excluded the world will not be able to believe in what it sees in the arena at the Olympic Games next month.” 

Another British outlet, the Times, bluntly admitted that it wanted to put “pressure” on the International Olympic Committee when it published an article entitled “Please ban Russia from the Rio Games” with an attached letter addressed to the IOC.

“The letter will intensify the pressure on the IOC after revelations of rampant, state-organised doping,” it read.

Another British tabloid, The Independent, commented on the upcoming IOC decision with the headline “There is enough evidence to ban Russia from Rio 2016, and the Olympics’ credibility rests on it.”

The article itself claimed “the evidence of a state-sponsored doping regime has been uncovered by so many individuals, with such minimal difficulty, that you have to say Russia’s criminality is laughably transparent.”

Meanwhile, an editorial in the New York Times also headlined with a call to “ban Russia from the Rio Olympics.”

Some of the statements cited the latest WADA report, but its lead investigator, Richard McLaren, told RT that he would not publish any evidence of alleged state-sponsored doping in Russia for the public. “We certainly have it. But we will not publish it.”

Following McLaren’s allegations, the sports editor of the German Bild said the newspaper will cut Russia out of the medal counts it publishes.

“Should Russia be allowed to participate in the Games, Bild will have it exempted from the medal count. Declare Russian athletes’ results null and void,” his statement read. The outlet denied RT an interview to clarify the matter.

A pre-judgment decision was also issued by the UK’s Daily Mail just a day before IOC statement. The paper rolled out with a headline saying Russian athletes “will be banned” from Olympics, citing its own sources. 

However, the IOC upheld its decision to only suspend Russia’s track and field team, while refraining from a complete ban.

READ MORE: Why were ‘journalists’ lobbying for a blanket ban on Russian athletes? (OP-ED)