icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
23 Dec, 2017 04:16

‘Neocon emissary Boris Johnson embarrassed Britain on Moscow visit’

Boris Johnson has embarrassed the British people he was supposed to represent in Moscow by publicly voicing unsubstantiated claims that Kremlin “unsuccessfully” interfered in Brexit vote, political commentator John Wight believes.

On his first trip to Russia as a Foreign Secretary, the first in five years to do so, Johnson, ineffectively tried to accuse Moscow of meddling in UK’s internal affairs, parroting unfounded claims. “I think you should recognize that Russian attempts to interfere in our relations and our referendums, whatever they may have been, have not been successful, so you can reassure yourself on that front," Johnson said Friday after meeting his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov.

“Without facts, it’s very hard to have a serious discussion,” said Lavrov in response, stopping short of accusing his counterpart of lying. “I think you’ve just made all of this up. Unfortunately, you are a sort of hostage to this subject. It’s very hard to get down from the fence you’ve climbed.”

Wright noted Johnson’s baseless accusations and inability to conduct himself at the highest of state levels. He said the foreign secretary seemed “ill-equipped for the rigours of his high office.”

RT: Boris Johnson said Russia meddled in the elections of some countries, naming a few. He said further that Moscow “unsuccessfully” tried to interfere in the British referendum, but he didn’t provide any evidence. It seems 2017 is the year of making claims and not providing evidence. What did you make of these claims?

John Wight: There is no evidence at all to support these allegations. Let’s be clear, Boris Johnson visited and peddled this neo-McCarthyite line. He did so not as an emissary of the British people, which is his function after all as a foreign secretary, but as an emissary of the establishment press and this murky network of these neocon think tanks that are pushing this anti-Russian hysteria, this neo-McCarthyism.
And it really just proves that Boris Johnson is ill-equipped for the rigours of such a high office. It would have been better if he spent as much time practicing this briefing, getting to grips with the issues concerning that office, rather than practicing his Russian to try to impress Sergey Lavrov and the press at the press conference.

Boris Johnson is the man that believes that life is just a never-ending dinner party at which he is a guest, and he is trying to pass off the bold jokes in these hail fellow well met platitudes as compensation for his complete lack of ability and incompetence in such a very, very important role. It was a disastrous visit by Boris Johnson, yet another on his record of disastrous visits around the world, which only serve to embarrass Britain in the eyes of the world.

RT: No one has produced any evidence of Russian meddling. But it is quite a useful tool, isn’t it, to build up this ‘enemy’ who is interfering in your domestic issues, be it the Russians or anybody else?

JW: The only people who have interfered in all of the elections that is alleged that Russia has interfered in, has been the people who voted in those elections. And the reason why we’re getting this establishment rage, and it is liberal establishment rage is because their candidates are losing. And their politics are no longer having the traction they used to have with supplicant populations, because they have more information on their hands, they have social media. Not everything on social media is true, but it has opened up avenues of other sources of information and they are talking to one another. And so they are able to get to grips with these issues because they understand that the status quo is certainly not working, either at home or abroad. As I mentioned earlier, this network of neocon think tanks... They are the real distorting influence in the politics of Western countries. And it is that line and that distorting influence that is cancer we should be focusing on, but instead of that, they are trying to distract people by focusing on the ‘big, bad Russian bear.’

British writer and broadcaster, Mary Dejevsky, however, was cautiously optimistic that Johnson’s visit to Russia could have been more constructive behind the scenes, and would bear some results in the future.

“There is evidence of an increasing rapport between Sergey Lavrov and Boris Johnson, but from the British side there is an exaggerated awareness of how this will play in the UK. The government and Boris Johnson seem to believe that the British public and the Conservative Party expect a very tough line to be taken towards Russia. I am not sure the Foreign Secretary and Downing Street are right in this respect,” Dejevsky told RT.

“Anything positive that will come out of that meeting will only emerge in time. I think Boris Johnson is going to come back and say ‘I didn’t give an inch to the Russians.’ And then in time there will be other visits – perhaps a reciprocal visit – and maybe things will start to unfreeze.”