Outsourcing security greases corporate warmongering
In Washington DC the anti-war movement is sick of America's wars overseas. They blame it on the force of the military industrial complex: by definition a system of perpetual war fueled by profit and global expansion.
In his farewell address to the nation, the 34th president of the United States Dwight D, Eisenhower – a decorated military general himself – gave an infamous warning about the dangers of war nearly half a century ago on January 17, 1961. He said, “We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.”
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist,” Eisenhower said back then.
Today, Eisenhower’s chilling message is the reality of America's ongoing military operations worldwide.
War is big bucks, especially for civilian, defense and private security contractors – the vital organs of today’s military apparatus.
“Right now on the ground of Afghanistan the US has 140,000 people that are called contractors,” Jeremy Scahill, investigative journalist and author, estimated. “Many of them are mercenaries just on the Department of Defense payroll. The State Department has another 14,000. [Barack] Obama during his presidency has doubled the number of armed contractors in Afghanistan. So, what we see is a radical outsourcing of war,” Scahill noted.
To put figures into perspective, government records show nearly 70% of the military budget is spent on contractors. Multinational corporations like Boeing Company, Raytheon Company and NorthRup Grumman Corporation, to name a few, are making a killing off of war.
“The whole system is the US addiction to privatized warfare,” Jeremy Scahill elaborated.
As a result of the sheer expense of privatized warfare on the US taxpayer, it has driven protestors to demand Congress to pass the “Stop Outsourcing Security Act” – a bill that would drastically downsize the use of corporate contractors in war zones.
It would appear that the anti-war activists are up against an unbeatable force, but most hope that, by holding public teachings, the warning Eisenhower echoed on his last day in office will finally be considered by politicians and the Pentagon.