Leaked trial evidence suggests NYPD set arrest quotas
The recording, leaked to The Nation magazine, is only a portion of the evidence currently being reviewed as part of a federal class action lawsuit, Floyd. v. City of New York, brought on by the Center for Constitutional Rights. The recording appears to capture a union representative at a Bronx precinct meeting, advocating for a quota system.
“I spoke to the [commanding officer] for about an hour-and-a-half,” the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association delegate says in the audio recording, “Twenty-and-one. Twenty-and-one is what the union is backing up…. They spoke to the [Union] trustees. And that’s what they want, they want twenty-and-one.”
An anonymous NYPD officer who spoke with The Nation confirmed the content of the recording: “Twenty-and-one means twenty summonses and one arrest a month,” ranging from parking and moving violations to open container laws.
Though the quotas might simply pressure officers to be extra vigilant, they can also result in bogus stops: “The sergeant told me to write [up] two minorities for blocking pedestrian traffic,” the anonymous officer said, “but they were not blocking pedestrian traffic.”
More troubling is that officers depicted the sort of retaliation that they can expect if they fail to meet quotas. This could mean transfers to other boroughs, low evaluation scores and being denied overtime pay.
The Floyd v. NYC case, which opened this week in the US District Court for New York’s Southern District, alleges that the NYPD’s emphasis on meeting quotas has resulted in officers carrying out suspicion-less stops, largely in communities of color.
The plaintiffs allege that the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy
results in unconstitutional stops based on racial
John Eterno, a former police captain and co-author of The Crime Numbers Game: Management by Manipulation, says pressure to carry out arrests and summonses has always existed, though it’s now become the “overwhelming management style of the department,” as quoted by The Nation.
Adhyl Polanco, the officer responsible for recording the audio
evidence in question, has since had charges brought against him by
the department for issuing bogus reports.