Manning trial: Judge rules WikiLeaks tweets relevant to ‘aiding the enemy’ charges
On the 12th day of trial, which resumed at Fort Meade, Maryland, June 26, military judge Col. Denise Lind weighed the admissibility of three pieces of evidence suggesting that an Army private Bradley Manning, 25, accused with leaking more than 700,000 files to WikiLeaks, took his cues from the whistle-blowing organization in disclosing classified information.
Judge Lind has ruled that two WikiLeaks tweets from 2010 – one
claiming to have an encrypted video of US strikes on civilians
and the other seeking military Internet addresses – are
admissible for Identification.
Despite this, there is still no evidence that Private First Class
Bradley Manning, 25, saw either of these tweets, the judge ruled
that they can be admitted as circumstantial evidence, due to
their timing and public availability and the fact that Manning
was known to have searched Intelink (the military’s Google) for
As for another piece of evidence – WikiLeaks’ "Most Wanted" list
of items it was seeking from the public, apparently posted in
November 2009 on its website - the judge ruled that it is
not “properly authenticated”, while it still would be relevant to
show Manning’s knowledge of WikiLeaks and its intentions.
Manning’s defense team has been arguing that Twitter postings
offered by prosecutors did not meet the court's standards.
"Anyone can create a Web page...that looks like WikiLeaks or that looks like Twitter," attorney Captain Joshua Tooman said when the government was first considering its case.
Back then the lawyer insisted a government investigator had
accessed the tweets through Google cache, rather than directly
through Twitter or WikiLeaks. He claimed, the evidence failed to
meet the test of authenticity since there was no way of knowing
what the website looked like when the tweet or page was
Bradley Manning, charged with 22 counts, faces trial more than
three years after his arrest for transmitting 700,000 classified
documents to WikiLeaks, what is said to be the biggest US data
leak in the nation’s history. Manning pleaded guilty to charges
of leaking information to the anti-secrecy website, which alone
could confine him to prison for 20 years, but the US is pursuing
further charges of aiding the enemy, which carries a maximum
sentence of death.