icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Disney seemingly drops name of Boba Fett ship ‘Slave I’ in marketing – actor leads fan outrage

Disney seemingly drops name of Boba Fett ship ‘Slave I’ in marketing – actor leads fan outrage
Slavery may be a sad fact in the Star Wars universe, but having a ship’s name that refers to it is apparently a no-no for Disney. ‘Slave I’ has been quietly recast as ‘Boba Fett’s Starship’ by LEGO, and some fans are outraged.

The ship piloted by the iconic Mandalorian bounty hunter may not be as famous as Han Solo’s ‘Millennium Falcon’, but remains a cherished part of the Star Wars canon. Apparently Disney, the owner of the franchise, doesn’t like to remind people about the vessel’s actual name.

The apparent policy was highlighted last week by the website Jedi News, which asked people at LEGO why, unlike earlier products, their latest incarnation of ‘Slave I’ was named simply ‘Boba Fett’s Starship’ and the answer was that “everybody” does it these days.

“It’s probably not something which has been announced publicly but it is just something that Disney doesn’t want to use any more,” LEGO Star Wars Design Director Jens Kronvold Frederiksen explained.

Also on rt.com ‘Language policing’: University wants ‘oppressive’ phrases like ‘picnic’ & ‘trigger warning’ retired, offers ‘alternatives’

Since acquiring Star Wars’ intellectual property almost a decade ago, Disney has taken the galaxy far, far away in a new creative direction, ostensibly making it in line with the values of modern audiences. Some hardcore fans see this as ruining their beloved fictional universe by, for example, turning Luke Skywalker into a reclusive drunkard in ‘The Last Jedi’. So even the smallest hint of catering to the woke may unleash a tornado of fan anger.

Leading the charge against the stealth renaming was none other than Boba Fett himself. Mark Anthony Austin is a visual effects artist by profession and helped animate creatures in the 1997 special edition of ‘A New Hope’. He is also an enthusiastic admirer of the silent mercenary and portrayed him at various conventions before getting an uncredited cameo as Fett in the same instalment.

Austin launched a barrage of tweets protesting that, for him, the ship will always remain ‘Slave I’. He said while he understands why the DMV wouldn’t allow him to put the name on his licence plates, it was not up to Disney to enforce this “idiocy.” He said: “Not buying it. Not conforming to the Mouse, no siree. Not gonna happen.”

He also jokingly suggested some other names that sensibility-trained Disney managers may want to alter in Star Wars as well, including calling the franchise “Star Disputes.”

One of the jokes was about Princess Leia’s famous metal bikini and chained collar outfit – a look which was traditionally called “Slave Leia” but should be called “Temporarily Without Freedom Leia,” according to Austin. Disney actually dropped this type of merchandise a few years ago.

The outcry from Austin was apparently supported by fellow Boba Fett actor Daniel Logan, who played him in ‘Attack of the Clones’. He joked that the upcoming collectible of HMS ‘Bounty’, a starship from the Star Trek franchise, should be likewise renamed “Commander Kruge’s Starship.”

Star Trek is owned by Disney rival ViacomCBS, but it too has undergone some transformations that many older fans don’t appreciate. Logan tagged Christopher Lloyd, who portrayed the Klingon officer in ‘Star Trek III: The Search for Spock’.

While plenty of people joined Austin’s passionate rebuke of the “renaming,” many others saw it as a ‘nontrovercy’. The ship’s name was not actually retroactively changed, judging by its entry on starwars.com. And if it were, what’s the big deal? people wondered.

Slavery itself has been routinely portrayed in Star Wars as an institution in some parts of the galaxy. Anakin Skywalker, the future Darth Vader, was a child slave on Tatooine before being recruited by the Jedi order.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.