What’s in the archives? Panicked Biden tries to dodge search for sexual assault claims proof in bizarre Morning Joe interview
Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden came off panicked in an interview that was supposed to put the Tara Reade sexual assault allegations to rest, raising questions about what incriminating evidence is in his archives.
An increasingly nervous Biden appeared to unravel before viewers' eyes in an interview with Mika Brzezinski on Morning Joe on Friday. The former vice president became noticeably agitated as the host pushed him to allow a search for former Senate staffer Tara Reade's name in his personal archives at the University of Delaware, records the university recently ordered re-sealed until two years after Biden "retires from public life."
Full exchange on Biden saying he won't release his Senate records at the Univ. of Delaware -- "The idea that they would be made public while I was running for public office, they could be taken out of context ... they could be fodder." pic.twitter.com/tUOGBBttOd— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) May 1, 2020
The candidate declared he was "absolutely certain" there was nothing related to Reade or her sexual assault claim against Biden, or any "personnel records" at all, but was nevertheless adamant that the records not be searched even for her name. Claiming to be concerned that other material in the university archives could become "fodder in a campaign," Biden insisted any search be limited to the National Archives in Maryland.
Are we going to address the fact that when he was asked why he would not allow a search of Tara Reade's name in the U of Delaware records he was bumbling, stumbling, fumbling and looking like a deer in headlights. Campaign ad, play that clip again and again. It says GUILTY.— Carmine Sabia (@CarmineSabia) May 1, 2020
Biden is done. Time for slimy Hillary to ooze on in.— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) May 1, 2020
While Biden went on to emphatically deny Reade's claims that he had pinned her up against a wall and forcefully penetrated her with his finger back in 1993, many took his appalling interview performance as evidence of guilt. Why, they asked, was he so reluctant to allow a search of the university papers?
Mika’s cut-throat questioning of Joe Biden is the start of the end of his presidency. Listen to his hesitation, the Biden campaign didn’t prepare him for this. Don’t be oblivious U Delaware has to reveal the evidence. #IBelieveTara NOT #IBelieveBidenpic.twitter.com/g2ohqSBHt7— Habiba Choudhury (@HabibaChoudhu) May 1, 2020
Biden campaign officials had occasion to "rifle through" the University of Delaware archives themselves at least once in the past year, according to Business Insider. It's not clear what they were looking for, or what if anything was removed – Reade came forward with the details of her alleged sexual assault by Biden in late March, after the university library had closed due to the coronavirus epidemic, meaning it is highly unlikely anyone has accessed the archive since then.
No doubt we are being played. There is NOTHING left at the University of Delaware after his people went through the files and Joe will claim vindication after he agrees to release the files. #Mika is playing us. They want you to THINK there might be something at U of Delaware.— Rich Zeoli (@Richzeoli) May 1, 2020
It would be different if there wasn't ample video evidence of Joe Biden groping, sniffing, oddly touching and making exceptionally distasteful remarks to women and little girls. THERE ARE SO MANY YOU CAN'T WATCH THEM ALL WITHOUT BEING DISTURBED. #DropOutJoe#DropOutBidenNow— WTFHappen2TheRevolution🖖🏾 (@AlexClaySays) May 1, 2020
However, given multiple other allegations of inappropriate touching leveled against Biden, supported by a truly preposterous amount of photographic evidence of Biden's touchy-feely behavior, some suspected the campaign used its previous visit to scrutinize the archives for any material that could be weaponized to support the allegations.
Instead, a Senate Historical Office staffer said the Fair Employment Practices records are governed by a Senate resolution mandating that "records containing personal privacy, information closed by statute, and records of executive nomination are closed for 50 years." pic.twitter.com/xUVyfnQP2H— Nicole Einbinder (@NicoleEinbinder) May 1, 2020
Many took a dim view of Biden's confidence that a search of the National Archives would come up clean, noting – among other things – that the office he confidently asserted would hold the complaint did not keep its records in the Archives, that the records in question are sealed until 2043, and that the filing process was at the time so complicated that less than a quarter of attempted complaints were formalized. Additionally, important papers have taken a walk from the de facto historical record in the past, including at the hands of Sandy Berger, the former national security adviser to President Bill Clinton. And the political establishment is certainly no stranger to memory-holing inconvenient records.Also on rt.com Orwellian ‘memory hole’ in action? Stealth removal of CNN clip supporting Biden sex assault claim proves MSM’s double standards
However, political conviction seemed to be the ultimate deciding factor in whether viewers interpreted the Morning Joe interview favorably. Wielding the twin swords of whataboutism and wrongthink-shaming, Biden fans rushed to his defense.
Joe Biden doesn't have any NDAs forbidding anyone from speaking.trump, meanwhile, has NDAs all over the place. I'm so not in the mood for another "but her emails," guys.Hold trump to the same scrutiny, or get off Biden's case. #IBelieveBiden— BrooklynDad_Defiant! (@mmpadellan) May 1, 2020
The Obama Coalition believes Joe BidenBlack Women believe Joe BidenMy Family believes Joe BidenI believe Joe BidenNOW If you want to continue with this bullshit sexual assault narrative then you were NEVER an ally and want trump to have another term#IBelieveBiden— ABlackWomanWhoDontGiveAF*ck (@battletested5) May 1, 2020
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!