icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Court rules airline passengers can sue TSA agents for abusive searches

Court rules airline passengers can sue TSA agents for abusive searches
A federal appeals court ruled travelers can sue Transportation Security Administration officers for “abusive conduct,” stripping the controversial agency of the government immunity that has protected it thus far.

The 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia declared TSA screeners act as “investigative or law enforcement officers” when searching passengers, meaning they can be subject to civil claims for intentional wrongdoing under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The decision reverses a controversial 2018 ruling by a three-judge panel from the same court that effectively gave TSA officers immunity under the law.

Also on rt.com Federal court shields overzealous TSA agents from abuse lawsuits

The “intimate physical nature” of the screenings classifies them as a law enforcement act, the court ruled in a 9-4 decision on Friday, meaning the government’s immunity from lawsuits does not apply in cases where TSA agents abuse their power.

If you think you are a victim of intentional misconduct by TSA agents, you can now have your day in court,” exulted lawyer Paul Thompson. His client, Nadine Pellegrino, sued the TSA over a 2006 incident in which she was imprisoned for 18 hours and charged with crimes including assault and making terroristic threats, after objecting to an especially invasive screening as she attempted to board a US Airways flight at Philadelphia International Airport.

While she was acquitted of the charges two years later, Pellegrino and her husband sued the TSA for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution – only to be told last year that they were not legally permitted to sue the TSA. Now, at least, the case can continue.

Dissenting judges feared the decision would open a Pandora’s box of lawsuits. But Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro noted that in 2015, less than 200 of the 700 million passengers screened filed complaints that could potentially have led to waivers of government immunity for the TSA.

The TSA has developed quite a reputation in the 18 years of its existence, with horror stories surfacing regularly in the media about invasive searches of children, veterans, and the elderly. In a recent example caught on video, triple-amputee US Air Force veteran Brian Kolfage (of ‘We Build the Wall’ fame) was practically cavity-searched at the gate by an overzealous TSA agent. 

Also on rt.com TSA flags ‘privacy risks’ in new airport scanners

After a 2015 Department of Homeland Security study revealed that the TSA failed to detect weapons and firearms a shocking 95 percent of the time, the agency adopted a much more invasive procedure, warning local law enforcement in 2017 that they might receive phone calls complaining about the “comprehensive” searches before people got used to them. 

Judge Ambro, however, insisted that “the overwhelming majority of [agents] perform their jobs professionally despite far more grumbling than appreciation.

If you like this story, share it with a friend!

Podcasts