Conservative Twitter voices say they are being attacked with malicious ‘abusive speech’ complaints
Conservative newspaper Washington Examiner's Byron York was reported for posting an apparently innocuous link to his own August 9 story, which exposed the lobbying work Steele, notorious for his Donald Trump dossier, performed for Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska.
York said that he was not found guilty of violating the social network's rules.
Big relief: @Twitter informs me I have been investigated but found not to have violated its abusive speech code. (Notification and problematic tweet, seen below, involved new evidence on origin of Trump dossier.) pic.twitter.com/BL1GgV1OhT— Byron York (@ByronYork) 10 August 2018
Another target has been unflattering stories about Democratic senator Feinstein, another key figure in the drive to prove alleged collusion between Donald Trump and the Kremlin. In a blow to the credibility of the Senate Intelligence Committee member, Feinstein was revealed to have employed a Chinese spy on her staff for two decades. Several conservatives reporters dug deeper on the long-standing friendship between China and Feinstein, only to have their efforts flagged up by online complainers.
Two of those who have publicized the rejected complaints against them have been Weekly Standard's Mark Hemingway and the Federalist's Ben Weingarten.
WTH. It looks like someone is trying to protect Feinstein from criticism. pic.twitter.com/vn7g33nFkw— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) 9 August 2018
So Twitter received a complaint regarding my tweet about my story on Sen Feinstein's (and her husband's) longtime #China ties, pro-China positions (economically, militarily, rhetorically) and profits from investing in China. Who's afraid of the truth? https://t.co/Lx5lavBpdzpic.twitter.com/Dr7J549K51— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) 9 August 2018
Some see a concerted campaign to silence Conservatives.
There appears to be a trend of conservative journalists having their tweets reported for inoffensive content pic.twitter.com/P1tANGRDFE— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) 10 August 2018
This is not a new phenomenon.
Mass reporting of innocent or midly questionable tweets with the intention of having them banned has happened for a period of years, with Conservatives stating that organized democratic 'anti-troll' and activist groups, such as Shareblue media systematically engage in the practice.
But there is particular concern following the simultaneous ban of Alex Jones's Infowars from several leading social media platforms. While Twitter has so far resisted, there has been a well-organized drive in the media and online to force it follow the others. More mainstream conservatives, already alarmed at what they perceive to be unfair practices against them, such as shadow bans, believe they could become the next target of attacks on dissenting voices.
If Twitter is going to ban or suspend people then I ask that they be consistent.— Tim Pool (@Timcast) 11 August 2018
Ban everyone or ban no one.
There have been numerous instances where conservatives have parroted statements by progressives and gotten suspended while the originals remain live.
If Twitter is now banning "extremist groups," why does Antifa and Westboro Baptist Church still have accounts? Could it possibly be because neither of those groups will have an impact on the mid-terms that is negative for Democrats? https://t.co/rV9hlJqqK3— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) 11 August 2018