Facebook, Google could help US ‘retaliate’ against Russia, other nations – Senator McConnell (VIDEO)
On Tuesday, senior executives from the trio of major tech firms went before the US Congress to discuss an alleged ‘disinformation’ campaign supposedly designed to influence the election.
Republican Senator Mitch McConnell has since suggested that social media and other internet services could provide the US with an opportunity to “retaliate” against adversaries such as Russia.
US web security expert Jeffrey Carr, founder of an open-source project to investigate cyber-attacks, said private entities engaging in government orchestrated attacks would become “huge” targets for hackers.
“It’s hard to say what Senator McConnell means but any private or public company that takes offensive action against any other entity would be both committing a crime and painting a huge target on their own backs [for] hackers who could cause them serious harm,” Carr told RT.com.
“They’d instantly become targets for an escalated response by those who they retaliated against, not to mention an untold number of supporters who would rush to join in the counterattacks,” he added.
Speaking to MSNBC, McConnell expressed his disappointment that key figures like Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg had not provided answers at Tuesday’s hearing.
He then mooted the idea of weaponizing their services. Big tech could be used, he said, to “retaliate” against Russia, whose government has repeatedly denied any allegations of attempts to influence US voters.
“What we ought to do with regard to the Russians is retaliate. Seriously retaliate against the Russians and these tech firms could be helpful in giving us a way to do that,” McConnell told MSNBC host Hugh Hewitt.
McConnell added that he wasn’t sure if it’s a good idea for a special committee to assess the relationship between US security agencies and tech companies. He said the challenge facing US authorities is balancing security with First Amendment rights, which he believes should not extend to “foreigners.”
“It certainly would help if the CEOs were willing to testify [at Congress]. But I think the big, big subject with a lot of national security implications… [is] trying to figure out how to balance national security versus the First Amendment.”