icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Maryland’s military weapons ban upheld by federal appeals court

Maryland’s military weapons ban upheld by federal appeals court
Maryland’s ban on semiautomatic and military-style weapons has been upheld by the 4th Circuit US Court of Appeals in a 10-4 ruling. The decision not only protects the state’s gun control laws, but also similar ones in California, Connecticut and New Jersey.

Laws against assault weapons and large-capacity magazines in Maryland were upheld on Tuesday when a Court of Appeals overturned a previous ruling on the ban. While the 4th Circuit Court in Richmond, Virginia ruled strongly in favor of the ban, the four dissenting judges believed that their counterparts had undermined the Second Amendment.

Dissenting Judge William B. Traxler Jr. claimed his colleagues have “gone to greater lengths than any other court to eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms.

However, the court ruled that “we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war.” Judge Robert B. King wrote that weapons of war are most useful in the military and the previous Supreme Court ruling on District of Columbia vs. Heller excluded these kinds of weapons from being protected by the Second Amendment.

We have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war that the Heller decision explicitly excluded from such coverage,” King wrote.

Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, who concurred with King, focused on the state’s responsibility to protect their citizens, writing, “it is their community, not ours. It is their safety not ours. It is their lives, not ours.

The ruling was celebrated by Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh who had spearheaded the push to ban military-like weapons after a mass shooting in 2012 resulted in the deaths of 20 children and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut. “It’s unthinkable that people could say that those weapons of war are protected by the Second Amendment,” Frosh told reporters on Tuesday.

However, the Maryland State Rifle and Pistol Association and the Maryland Licensed Firearms Dealers Association claimed that the guns are not exclusively meant for war but are used by citizens legally for hunting, self-protection or target practice. They emphasized that because the weapons are designed for battle, they are easier to handle and have more precise targeting.