icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
11 Jan, 2017 00:08

‘I think there’s an RT channel here’: Clapper & senators use fuzzy math on RT’s reach

‘I think there’s an RT channel here’: Clapper & senators use fuzzy math on RT’s reach

The US intelligence community testified on Capitol Hill about supposed Russian interference in the 2016 election. In doing so, they provided more free advertising for RT, yet also seemed confused about the network, its reach and its coverage.

Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, NSA Director Admiral Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey testified in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee Tuesday afternoon about a recently declassified report on accusations that Russia influenced the presidential election.

READ MORE: RT stars in ODNI report on 'Russian activities and intentions' in US presidential election

The “multifaceted” campaign blended propaganda, namely by RT, with covert intelligence operations, including cyber activity, and official efforts by the government, third-party intermediaries and “paid social media users or ‘trolls.’”

It was clear during the hearing that neither the intelligence chiefs nor the senators had done their homework about the channel.

When asked if it was fair to compare RT to CNN, MSNBC or Fox News ‒ as Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, whom President-elect Donald Trump has tapped to be his national security advisor and who has been a guest on RT, has argued ‒ Clapper told senators that RT directly gets its editorial guidance from the Russian government.

“To me, the major difference here is the bulk of funding for RT comes from Russian government and the Russian government gives editorial direction on what RT is supposed to broadcast,” Clapper said. “So I think that’s a little bit different from CNN.”

From there, Clapper’s intel about RT seemed to get a bit… fuzzy. He noted that the channel is “very prevalent in Europe,” but not as much in the US.

“I think there’s an RT channel here,” Clapper told Senator Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) that’s accessible to “some number” of people here.

“I doubt if [the audience] is very large” in the US, Blunt replied. “I don’t want to defend RT. I think it’s a propaganda arm of a government that’s definitely not on our side, and we need to be aware of that.”

Yet Senator Angus King (I-Maine) gave an opposing assessment later in the hearing.

“RT America [has] millions of views on YouTube ‒ 850 million ‒ BBC about two-thirds of that, CNN significantly lower. Same thing in YouTube subscribers, RT America ‒ 450 million,” King said. “So RT is a significant media presence.”

King’s numbers aren’t accurate either, though. The RT network currently has over 4 billion views, and its flagship YouTube channel has just passed the 2 million subscriber mark. The 450 million figure was overinflated by any account, as the most-subscribed channel in history ‒ PewDiePie ‒ ‘only’ has 52.2 million subscribers, according to data compiled by Socialblade.

As a broadcaster, RT is available to 700 million people in more than 100 countries spanning five continents. In the US, it is offered by cable companies in several metropolitan areas, including New York and New Jersey outside of New York City; California’s Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco areas; Chicago, Illinois; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Washington, DC and its surrounds; and Toledo, Ohio. The channel is also available on Dish Network, a satellite provider.

Twitter users also called out Clapper for not knowing the details about RT's reach, despite the network’s heavy presence in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence report released on Friday.