icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Report on CIA torture won't be revealed under Freedom of Information Act

Report on CIA torture won't be revealed under Freedom of Information Act
The US legal system has rejected the public disclosure of the full torture report, after American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued federal agencies just before the Senate’s release of a much shorter executive summary in 2014.

“On the record before us, the Senate Committee’s intent to retain control of the Full Report is clear,” wrote Judge Edwards. “The Full Report therefore remains a congressional document that is not subject to disclosure under FOIA (The Freedom of Information Act).”

The unanimous ruling by the three-judge panel concluded that the 6,963-page so-called Senate torture report can’t be made public under the Freedom of Information Act, because the content is officially controlled by Congress, and Congressional documents are exempt from the open records law.

The ACLU sued under the Freedom of Information Act in 2013 to obtain the full report, whose 500-page executive summary was released in December 2014. ACLU demanded the full disclosure of the CIA’s use of so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques,” such as waterboarding and the use of secret prisons abroad under former President George W. Bush.

In court, ACLU argued that the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence “relinquished control” of the full report after allowing President Barack Obama and other agencies to review it before the summary was made public.

However, the appeal court judges rejected the reasoning, pointing to a 2009 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence letter, then headed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein to the CIA that “makes it plain that the Senate committee intended to control any and all of its work product, including the full report, emanating from its oversight investigation of the CIA,” ruled Judge Edwards.

READ MORE: Victims of brutal CIA interrogation win landmark ruling to sue black site psychologists

ACLU lawyer Hina Shamsi said in a statement that the ruling "has the disappointing result of keeping the full truth about the CIA torture program from the American public, and we’re considering our options for appeal."

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.

Podcasts