Guardian walks back report of privacy violations by Whisper anonymity app
The outlet has also entirely removed a column claiming that Whisper was misleading users, reiterating that it never accused those behind the app of breaking the law.As notedby The Wall Street Journal, the commentary article “argued that Whisper misled users into thinking they were communicating privately when, in fact, their comings and goings were tracked and profiled.”
On its website, Whisper describes itself as an “anonymous social network” that allows you to “anonymously share your thoughts and emotions with the world, and form lasting and meaningful relationships in a community built around trust and honesty.”
In a lengthy paragraph, the Guardian clarified much of its reporting, starting with the claim that Whisper was hastily modifying its policies in response to reporter inquiries.
Meanwhile, the outlet clarified that practices tied to Whisper – such as collecting IP addresses and information-sharing with law enforcement in cases where death or serious injury may be involved – is “both lawful and industry standard.”
In its correction, the Guardian stated that IP addresses are collected by all internet companies and that having the addresses themselves doesn’t mean a user’s location can be pinpointed, since IP addresses are “a very rough and unreliable indicator of location.” Whisper maintains that it does not collect personally identifiable information from users, and the newspaper said a user’s identity and location can only be tagged if the individual chooses to release such data.
“The company has no access to users’ names or phone numbers, but is storing information about the precise time and approximate location of all previous messages posted through the app,” the Guardian wrote in its original report. “The data, which stretches back to the app’s launch in 2012, is being stored indefinitely, a practice seemingly at odds with Whisper’s stated policy of holding the data only for ‘a brief period of time.’”
In a response to the story last year, Whisper said private messages are stored for two days and IP addresses for seven.
Whisper also came under fire for sharing information with the Department of Defense’s Suicide Prevention Office, though the Guardian clarified that no personal information was handed over.
“We appreciate the Guardian issuing the corrections and setting the record straight,” Whisper’s chief executive, Michael Heyward, said to the WSJ. “For us, this isn’t about vindication. It is vital that our users and partners know that Whisper is and always has been totally committed to the privacy of everyone who uses our product.”
The UK-based paper’s original story sent waves through the app developer, with the company suspending staff and conducting an internal investigation. Whisper’s former news editor, Joshua Chavers, was also terminated. He tweeted about the Guardian’s correction on Wednesday.
Heck if it weren’t for The Guardian’s reporting, I wouldn’t be out fishing, going to the beach rn, and, well, standing in unemployment line.
— Joshua Chavers (@JoshuaChavers) March 11, 2015