icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
11 Mar, 2015 00:04

Corporations fight Seattle minimum wage hike, cite slavery-ending law

Corporations fight Seattle minimum wage hike, cite slavery-ending law

A trade association representing giants such as McDonald’s is suing the city of Seattle over its minimum wage law. Claiming its members face unfair discrimination, it is using a constitutional amendment passed to end slavery as the basis for the lawsuit.

The International Franchise Association and several local franchise owners accuse Seattle of violating state and federal constitutions by requiring “large” employers – with 500 or more employees – to implement the law by 2017, while business with fewer than 500 employees have until 2021 to comply.

READ MORE: Nearly 500 arrested as fast-food workers go on strike across the US

They object to the law’s classification of franchises as “large” employers, arguing that franchises are independently owned and operated and the law imposes “significantly higher labor costs on small franchisees than on their non-franchised competitors.” This, they argue, is violating the “equal protections under the law” under the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution. (IFA v. Seattle)

Seattle voted in favor of a $15 per hour minimum wage last summer. It is the highest minimum wage in the country, and more than twice the federal rate of $7.25.

The lawsuit has come under a barrage of criticism, partly due to the plaintiffs’ usage of the Fourteenth Amendment. One of the three “Reconstruction Amendments,” it was adopted in 1868 as part of an effort to abolish slavery. It is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, and has been grounds for such landmark cases as Brown v Board of Education (1954) which ended segregation in schools, and Roe v Wade (1973) which lifted the ban on abortions.

The McNugget Buddies invoke the 14th amdmt to protect themselves, rather than workers with families to feed. http://t.co/UHqWGRgCRl

— Ron Fein (@ronfein) March 9, 2015

The idea of “fair, living wages” was very important to the amendment’s authors, while today it is being invoked to harm workers who are “slaving away for poverty wages,” argued Ron Fein in The Huffington Post. Fein is the legal director at Free Speech for People, an organization dedicated to making “corporations responsible and accountable to the public.”

Though Fein describes the lawsuit as McDonald’s going after Seattle, no McDonald’s franchise owners are named as plaintiffs. The fast-food giant is represented only indirectly, through the International Franchise Association.

While in the past, fast-food workers were teenagers looking to earn some spending money, today many of them are older and struggling to support their families on low wages and few benefits.

The combination of low wages and benefits, often coupled with part-time employment, means that many of the families of fast-food workers must rely on taxpayer-funded safety net programs to make ends meet,” said a 2013 UC Berkeley study of wages in the fast-food industry.

Fast-food workers have gone on strike several times since 2012, protesting low wages and a lack of union representation.

I know a lot of my friends don't eat @mcdonalds, but if you needed another reason, it suing Seattle over our $15 min wage is a good one.

— Susi Stuart (@susistuart) March 10, 2015