icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

‘Covid-19 doesn’t infect during business hours?’ Britain's planned bar & pub curfew mocked online

‘Covid-19 doesn’t infect during business hours?’ Britain's planned bar & pub curfew mocked online
People have argued online that forcing UK drinking establishments to close by 10pm would be ineffective against the coronavirus. The government is expected to propose new restrictions amid a surge in Covid-19 cases.

Pubs, bars and restaurants in England will be forced to close their doors by 10pm starting from Thursday, UK media reported. Prime Minister Boris Johnson is expected to announce the new rule in parliament on Tuesday evening, along with other additional measures to fight Covid-19.

Britain's coronavirus alert level was recently upgraded from three to four (out of five), with medical officials warning that the cases are "rising rapidly and probably exponentially."

However, the idea of making pubs close early was met with disbelief and ridicule online.

"Can someone please explain to me the logic of the 10pm curfew: is there a higher rate of infection after 9.59?" one person wrote on Twitter.

"So COVID-19 doesn't infect during business hours?" another skeptical commenter wondered.

People argued on social media that the curfew would be useless because patrons would either "get drunk faster before the pubs close," or go out earlier and buy more drinks to "compensate for the reduced hours."

Some, on the other hand, insisted that the new restrictions would be effective if "policed properly.""By limiting the amount of drinking time available should reduce the amount of people getting drunk," one person noted.

Others said that the government was forced to consider the curfew only after people had failed to wear masks and follow existing social distancing rules. "Count your lucky stars that the pubs aren't being closed entirely because that will be next if people don't comply to the rules," one Twitter user stated.

Also on rt.com A second UK Covid-19 lockdown is doomed to fail: Brits have no faith in their leaders anymore and won’t comply

To tackle the alarming rise in daily Covid-19 cases, the government delayed the next step of easing the quarantine rules in late July and introduced tougher regulations on mass gatherings earlier this month.

As of Monday, the UK has had 398,625 coronavirus cases and 41,788 deaths, according to government data.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.

Podcasts