Hammer Labour, but where is the Tories’ official code on anti-Semitism, asks Jewish author
Michael Rosen, a well-known writer of children's books, has taken to social media to ask why the Conservative Party attacked Labour over the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition and its 11 examples, but have not themselves included them in their code of conduct - a code that does not cover the behavior of grassroots Tory members.
Given that incidents of antisemitism are surfacing in the Tory Party - MEPs backing Orban, member talking of 'sweating like a Jew in an attic', young members with antisemitic graffiti on them; perhaps it's time to look at how they didn't adopt the 'examples' of the code? https://t.co/3XlXfY2v4J— Michael Rosen (@MichaelRosenYes) October 8, 2018
Eric Pickles, an ex-Tory minister, now peer and honorary vice president of charity, Holocaust Memorial Day Trust (HMDT), has tweeted that the Conservatives adopted the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism in December 2016 with no amendments, which is evidenced in their ‘ethics code’.
UK @Conservatives adopt @TheIHRA definition of #Antisemitism in December 2016, when it was the first political party in the World to do so. It’s enforced through the Party’s Ethics Code. No fuss, no amendments just got on with it. https://t.co/Z4nAr6mM6Spic.twitter.com/pWbZim4uqV— Eric Pickles (@EricPickles) October 7, 2018
However, as Rosen points out, the Conservatives ‘code of conduct’ that Pickles refers to does not make any reference to the 11 examples. The author and poet has also questioned why the Board of Deputies of British Jews has claimed the Tories have adopted the ‘examples’ when it appears they have not. The group has been highly critical of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s handling of anti-Semitism claims.
Lee, do you know why the @BoardofDeputies said the Conservative Party has adopted the IHRA with the ‘examples’ but the Party has not included the examples and Party does not include all members? https://t.co/sIK1qSGI3U— Michael Rosen (@MichaelRosenYes) October 8, 2018
The Jewish author has tried to reach out to the Conservative Party’s chairman, Brandon Lewis, to seek clarification on “when and exactly how the Conservative Party has (or has not) adopted the IHRA code.”
Lewis has responded on social media, simply by retweeting comments from Pickles, much to the dissatisfaction of many who have been highly critical of the Conservatives on this contentious issue.
I'm afraid to say that @BrandonLewis has been much too busy to answer my questions about when and exactly how the Conservative Party has (or has not) adopted the IHRA code. I guess when you know that you have the press supporting what you say, you don't have to bother. https://t.co/vjIDCStSfP— Michael Rosen (@MichaelRosenYes) October 7, 2018
Inadequate, Brandon (and painfully slow). This is simply an assertion that the IHRA definition was adopted. No mention of examples and no link to a formal resolution; you also fail to mention that - unlike @UKLabour - your code of conduct does not apply to members. Odd, that. 🤔— RogerJarman (@pedanteric5) October 8, 2018
But Mr Pickles' tweet is highly misleading at best, and a downright fib at worst, for the reasons I set out in my three responses to it. You cannot keep repeating the same misinformation in the hope that we will believe it, Brandon. https://t.co/TNi5VjKlD8— 🕊CrémantCommunarde #GTTO 🖐️ (@0Calamity) October 8, 2018
Labour’s governing body, finally agreed in September to adopt the IHRA’s definition of anti-Semitism with all 11 examples following highly charged debate over its pitfalls, with accusations that free speech in relation to Palestine could be curtailed.
The UK government line is that it committed the UK to the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism in 2016. The problem is it’s the Conservative code of conduct on anti-Semitism under scrutiny, not the UK government.
In July, Theresa May told parliament: “We should all sign up, as the Conservative Party has, to the definition of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance and all its annexes.” Thus far, no evidence of the Tories signing up to this international code and all its “annexes” has been unearthed.
RT has asked the Conservative Party for comment, but did not receive a response at the time of publication.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
Subscribe to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you.