icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

‘How many people have had sex in Parliament?’ Brits submit weird & wacky FoI requests

‘How many people have had sex in Parliament?’ Brits submit weird & wacky FoI requests
Some of last year’s requests for information on the ins and outs of British Parliament turned out to be a little baffling, as curious individuals demanded details about clogged toilets and illicit liaisons.

The British public has the right to access information logged by authorities through the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act.

In the first half of 2016, FoI requests went from more banal questions over total contributions “paid towards pensions of senior civil servants” to how much the government had spent on foie gras – both questions on which there were no records held.

In April, someone was keen on finding out whether there were records held of “house correspondence mentioning pork scratchings.”

Some people seemed to have a particular interest in MPs’ eating habits, demanding to know how much was spent on lobster in 2015.

Another request wanted details about “people engaging in sexual acts on the premises.

Consumption of illegal drugs in the Palace of Westminster was also a topic of interest, as was information pertaining to “efforts to reduce the amount of pornographic websites viewed” in the building. No records were held on these subjects, however.

Another inquisitive soul wanted to know the number of millionaire MPs in the House. There was also a request relating to the amount of arms seized from parliamentary visitors.

Questions placed in the second half of the year are yet to be published.

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.