icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
6 Jul, 2016 15:16

British military equipment ‘wholly inadequate’ in Iraq, says Chilcot

British military equipment ‘wholly inadequate’ in Iraq, says Chilcot

Equipment shortages and logistical failures helped to doom Britain’s war effort in Iraq by leaving troops with “wholly inadequate” kit, the Chilcot Inquiry has found.

The details are likely to distress the families of those killed in Iraq due to faulty or inadequate equipment. For years there were complaints over a lack of body armor and poor vehicles, among other flaws.

Equally damning is the claim the Ministry of Defence (MoD) did not appear to do anything about the complaints, with the report accusing it of allowing kit delays which “should not have been tolerated.

Chilcot’s findings are damning. Equipment was found in 2001 – two years before the war – to “not work well in hot and dusty conditions.” This was identified as a major issue given the UK was engaged in expeditionary warfare in arid regions.

The report also notes “asset tracking” was flawed, which eventually came to have a serious effect on operations.

Many soldiers also ended up deploying in clothing meant for temperate climates because “the MoD had insufficient desert combat suits and desert boots for all personnel.

As a result, desert-specific clothing was issued only to personnel who would be in theatre for an extended period. Standard issue boots were unsuitable for the task; 4 Armoured Brigade’s post-exercise report cited melting boots and foot rot as ‘a major issue.’”

Personal testimony by Iraq veterans on shortages is equally chilling. On Wednesday former soldiers Iain McMenemy and Damien Hern told the BBC their body armour was taken away because of a deficit.

First week into the combat campaign itself we were asked to give them up ... There were other troops that would be fighting perhaps on foot and the ones that were fighting on foot should have those ceramic plates because they may have more need for it,” they said.

The pair explained that at the time they were “manning vehicle checkpoints on foot so we were very much at that point in the firing line so we felt we shouldn’t be asked to give up the ceramic plates which were the difference between stopping a bullet and not.

Concerns were also raised about the British military being overstretched from 2006 onwards because it was engaged in parallel wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In his defence on Wednesday, former Prime Minister Tony Blair said he did not accept there were inadequate resources for the two wars, citing a Cabinet meeting where the issue was discussed.