icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
18 Nov, 2015 12:58

Cameron must work with Assad to defeat ISIS – British general

Cameron must work with Assad to defeat ISIS – British general

Prime Minister David Cameron must accept that in order to defeat Islamic State, Syrian President Bashar Assad must remain in power, a former chief of defense staff has said, calling the PM’s plans for Syria “contradictory.”

Cameron is currently preparing to hold a vote on extending airstrikes against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) from Iraq into Syria once he is guaranteed enough support from MPs.

But General Sir David Richards told the BBC Cameron needs to examine a deal with Russia which would allow Assad to control his troops at the forefront of the battle against the extremist group.

At the moment we’ve got contradictory war aims. We want to deal with ISIS, but we also want to get rid of Assad at the same time. I personally don’t think that’s plausible. Any general will tell you need to have unity of purpose and clear aims in a war. That muddies those aims,” he told Radio 4’s Today program.

At the G20 summit, which took place on Monday, Cameron hinted he would look to work more closely with Russia to defeat IS.

Richards, however, believes Cameron must accept that Assad’s Hezbollah and Iranian allies are the only forces capable of battling IS on the ground.

The real issue is can you use the one army that’s reasonably competent which is President Assad’s army? In that respect I personally would see a ceasefire being agreed in the way people are now talking, allowing potentially Assad’s army and Hezbollah and their Iranian backers and others to turn their attention on ISIS in a sequential operation. After that the politics would kick in and you would have to do something about the residual political structure within Syria.”

Richard’s views were echoed by Tory MP Julian Lewis, who suggested airstrikes alone would not be enough to defeat IS.

The chairman of the Defence Select Committee said airstrikes would be “pointless, futile and a dangerous empty gesture” without the accompanying ground troops.

Since January, British troops have been training moderate Syrian rebels, but no members of the UK armed forces have openly taken part in the conflict in Syria. There are reports however that Special Forces have been active in the region for some time.

You cannot do this job from the air alone unless there is a credible ground force and I don’t mean just the Kurds who are only part of the picture,” Lewis told the BBC.

There has to be a credible ground force which we are supporting with our air power.

“Otherwise it is a pointless, futile and a dangerous empty gesture. Apart from that it’s a great idea.”