icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

​Trident nukes could move to Gibraltar under SNP pressure, says academic

​Trident nukes could move to Gibraltar under SNP pressure, says academic
The patriotism of Gibraltarians could see Britain’s nuclear arsenal moved to the disputed territory south of Spain if a victorious Scottish National Party (SNP) force the weapons out of Scotland, according to a top academic.

Despite both Labour and Conservatives remaining committed to keeping Britain’s nukes in Scotland, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has been sounding out alternative locations according to a senior defense source.

A party was sent to Gibraltar in January to determine whether the option could work. One can only assume it’s part of broader contingency planning,” the source told the Daily Express.

With growing pressure from the SNP, and the general election looming, the MoD is said to have considered a number of alternative locations for the much-maligned and vastly expensive Cold War era weapon system.

READ MORE: SNP manifesto: End austerity, build a new progressive politics for 21st century Britain

Another option floated was Falmouth in the south of England, but the political fallout of putting nukes on the Cornish coast may prove too much for Britain’s increasingly isolated pro-nuclear parties.

In the search for a new home for Trident, levels of nationalist ardor may prove to be the decisive factor according to some commentators, and in few places does a love of the nation appear stronger than among those who live outside it.

Dr Nick Ritchie, who lectures in international security at the University of York, told the Express: “If the MoD is exploring other options, it shows admirable planning and foresight. Choosing Gibraltar would avoid the nimbyism [not in my backyard] question.

However, Ritchie felt the deal clincher would be pro-British feeling.

Any alternative site in England or Wales would carry political down sides. But Gibraltar has enough patriotism to overcome this.

Ritchie conceded that such a move might well inflame already existing tension with Gibraltar’s Iberian neighbors.

READ MORE: Scrap ‘irrelevant’ Trident nukes, Scottish trade unionists say

It would be interesting to see Spain’s reaction,” he said, “since it is a non-nuclear member of NATO.

Spain also claims Gibraltar as its own, in much the same fashion as Argentina claims the Falklands, and territorial tensions between London and Madrid flare up regularly.

Trident’s long term prospects in Scotland look increasingly troubled.

Last week the nuclear deterrent was branded “irrelevant” by the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), which said the weapon system no longer fulfills the needs of Britain’s security forces and faces a marked fall in public support.

In a combined report by the STUC and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), the authors ruled that Trident no longer served its initial function, under the Cold War-era policy of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).

The report argued the greatest threats to UK security (aside from North Korea) no longer possess nuclear weapons.