icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

​UK govt in the dock over ‘illegal’ air pollution levels

​UK govt in the dock over ‘illegal’ air pollution levels
Britain’s Supreme Court is to rule on whether the UK government has breached EU law by failing to tackle air pollution in the country’s cities.

Thursday’s decision in the landmark case is the culmination of a four year legal battle over the UK’s poor air quality.

The hearing follows a decision by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) last year, which ruled the British government must have a plan to meet EU air quality standards in the “shortest time possible.”

Activist lawyers at ClientEarth say current plans mean the UK will not meet legal limits for air pollution in cities such as London, Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham and Glasgow until after 2030.

At least 29,000 British residents die prematurely each year due to air pollution related medical conditions, ClientEarth asserts.

Southern and eastern parts of the UK experienced high-to-very high levels of air pollution earlier this month.

Elderly people were warned to avoid physical exertion, while asthma sufferers were advised they may need to use inhalers more often.

As a heavy smog settled on the capital, campaigners at Clean Air in London cautioned those training for the city’s upcoming marathon to “very seriously consider” training indoors.

READ MORE: Saharan dust blows into UK, triggering heart & lung health warnings

ClientEarth’s case against the British government centers on an EU directive, which set limits for air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide and a deadline of January 1, 2010.

The Air Quality Directive included a provision that allowed member states to establish zones where it would be difficult to reduce pollution.

According to the ECJ’s ruling last year, “a Member State may postpone the deadline until 1 January 2015 at the latest.”

The ECJ ruled the British government must have a plan to meet European air quality standards in the “shortest time possible.

ClientEarth hopes a decision by the Supreme Court will prompt politicians to draw up a new plan to urgently reduce illegal air pollution levels.

Such a strategy would need to target diesel vehicles, the main source of nitrogen dioxide pollution.

Alan Andrews, ClientEarth lawyer, said: “We all have the right to breathe clean air and ClientEarth has spent the last four years fighting to uphold that right in Court.”

The government’s current plans won’t achieve legal limits for decades. Every year that goes by, thousands more people will die or be made seriously ill from heart attacks, asthma attacks, strokes and cancer.

We need to get the most polluting diesel vehicles out of city centers as soon as possible for the sake of our health and our children’s health,” he added.

READ MORE: http://rt.com/uk/236653-uk-government-air-pollution/

In a statement, Friends of the Earth air pollution campaigner Jenny Bates echoed ClientEarth’s comments.

The government should be forced to come up with an urgent action plan to stop people choking on dirty air and end this national disgrace,” she said.

It’s time to tackle the main cause of this pollution, which is too much dirty traffic, by encouraging cleaner vehicles and getting more people on to bikes, buses, trains,” she said.

Keith Taylor, Green Party MEP for South East England said it was no surprise the British government was being taken to court after the UK experienced such high levels of pollution.

He told the Evening Standard: “The Green Party has been warning everyone for years about the serious health problems that are associated with air pollution.

How many court cases will it take before the government takes the issue seriously?