Russia, ISIS ‘greatest threats’ to UK security – Foreign Secretary Hammond

Britain's Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond (Reuters/Ints Kalnins)
Russia and the Islamic State pose the “greatest challenge” to national security in decades, the Foreign Secretary has warned.

Speaking at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) on Tuesday morning, Philip Hammond said no one could “confidently and accurately” predict the causes of further security threats, but security agencies must have the capacity to effectively monitor causes for concern.

The sheer number and range of cases, old and new, amounts to the greatest challenge to our collective security for decades and places unprecedented demands on those charged with keeping us safe,” he said.

His speech comes only two days before a backbench debate on defense spending in the Commons, where MPs will discuss the UK’s current commitment to NATO’s 2 percent of GDP spending target.

‘Single greatest threat’

The foreign secretary said Russia’s intensive modernization of its military capability was a “cause for concern,” likening the behavior to Cold War tactics.

The rapid pace with which Russia is seeking to modernize her military forces and weapons combined with the increasingly aggressive stance of the Russian military including Russian aircraft around the sovereign airspace of NATO states are all significant causes of concern.”

“We are in familiar territory for anyone over the age of about 50, with Russia’s behavior a stark reminder that it has the potential to pose the single greatest threat to our security,” he said.

Hammond added that the UK would continue to gather intelligence about Russia’s “capabilities and intentions” for “the foreseeable future.

READ MORE: Gaza off limits: Foreign Office blocks Scottish minister’s aid visit

“It is no coincidence that all of our agencies are recruiting Russian speakers again.”

The foreign secretary emphasized the necessity of British security agencies to continue their clandestine role, implying that he was in favor of meeting the 2 percent NATO spending target.

We must respond decisively and positively to the public and parliamentary debate about the powers required by our intelligence agencies to do their job in a changed technological environment – and in doing so draw a line under that debate so that the agencies can get on with the job of keeping this country safe,” he said.

‘Huge burden of responsibility’

Hammond addressed the recent controversy surrounding human rights charity CAGE, which claimed that Jihadi John, identified as Mohammed Emwazi, had been radicalized by UK foreign policy, saying that “apologists” bear a “huge responsibility” for violence committed by extremists.

MPs are expected later to approve new travel restrictions for those who pose a “terror-related threat,” which include stripping individuals of passports and introducing fines for airlines which breach the measures.

We are absolutely clear,” Hammond said. “The responsibility for acts of terror rests with those who commit them. But a huge burden of responsibility also lies with those who act as apologists for them.”

‘Tories cannot have their cake and eat it’

In the run-up to the defense spending debate Thursday, which threatens to provoke a rebellion on the Tory benches, Liberal Democrat Deputy PM Nick Clegg has said the Conservatives must “come clean” on the military budget.

“You cannot provide the British people with adequately resourced police forces, or an adequately resourced military forces if you take this ideological approach to reducing the amount of money that goes into public spending as a proportion of GDP for no economic reason at all.”

“At some point, the Conservative Party has got to come clean. They cannot have their cake and eat it. They cannot embark on this rightwing lurch towards an ever-shrinking state and also somehow pretend that they can fund everything in sight. You can’t. Something has to give.”

There has been increasing pressure on the government from former NATO chiefs and senior defense officials to maintain the 2 percent of GDP NATO spending target.