icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
19 Feb, 2015 14:16

​Lawyers ‘illegally’ spied on: UK govt comes clean, but denies ‘deliberate wrongdoing’

​Lawyers ‘illegally’ spied on: UK govt comes clean, but denies ‘deliberate wrongdoing’

Secretive policies employed by British intelligence agencies to monitor privileged conversations between lawyers and their clients are illegal under European human rights law, the UK government concedes.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the government admitted policies applied since 2010 did not meet the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), but denied “deliberate wrongdoing.

The government’s rare concession comes ahead of a legal challenge by Libyan exile Abdel Hakim Belhaj and his wife Fatima Boudchar, who are suing the British state for its role in their alleged rendition to Libya in 2004. There they were imprisoned and tortured.

Belhaj and Boudchar filed a separate case with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) alleging UK intelligence services spied on confidential communications with their lawyers, a practice which would give government prosecutors an unfair advantage in court.

While the British government’s admission provides fuel for the Libyan exiles’ claims of illegal government monitoring, it does not concern their particular allegations, which the IPT will hear early next month.

This admission following a separate IPT ruling earlier this month that data obtained by British spy agencies from the US National Security Agency (NSA) prior to the end of 2014 was in breach of human rights law.

Government admits breaching ECHR

The British government admitted its policy of spying on lawyer-client communications was in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which protects the right to privacy.

We acknowledge that the policies applied since 2010 have not fully met the requirements of the ECHR ... this includes a requirement that safeguards are made sufficiently public,” a government spokesperson said.

It does not mean that there was any deliberate wrongdoing on the part of the security and intelligence agencies, which have always taken their obligation to protect legally privileged material extremely seriously.

Nor does it mean that any of the agencies’ activities have prejudiced or in any way resulted in an abuse of process in any civil or criminal proceedings,” the spokesperson added.

READ MORE:British secret service admits rendition of Libyan opposition leaders bolstered Al-Qaeda – report

Violating ‘legal privilege’

UK intelligence agencies GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 first admitted to spying on lawyers last November.

As part of Belhaj and Boudchar’s case with the IPT, the security services handed evidence to the tribunal detailing secret policies for monitoring legally privileged material.

Laws protecting communications between clients and lawyers date back hundreds of years and are an established part of British common law.

Cori Crider, a director at legal charity Reprieve and one of Belhaj and Boudchar’s lawyers, said the government had endangered the fundamental British right to a fair trial.

READ MORE:Damning UK Libya intelligence partnership revealed

Reprieve has been warning for months that the security services’ policies on lawyer-client snooping have been full of loopholes big enough to drive a bus through,” she said in a statement.

For too long, the security services have been allowed to snoop on those bringing cases against them when they speak to their lawyers. In doing so, they have violated a right that is centuries old in British common law.

It appears government agencies intercepted the private lawyer-client communications of Belhaj and Boudchar, Crider said. He believes the information may have been passed on to lawyers or ministers involved in fighting their lawsuit against the British state.

Only time will tell how badly their case was tainted. But right now, the government needs urgently to investigate how things went wrong and come clean about what it is doing to repair the damage,” he added.

READ MORE:Libyan torture victim wins right to sue British government in open court

Rendition & torture

Last month, a classified MI5 document came to light revealing the British government’s role in rendering two key leaders of a Libyan opposition group to Tripoli, along with their families and Belhaj’s pregnant wife.

The intelligence assessment revealed how British policy towards Libyan opposition groups became hostile after former Prime Minister Tony Blair began cooperating with the then-Gaddafi government, partly in return for lucrative oil contracts.

Marked “UK/Libya Eyes Only – Secret,” the document was discovered in a Libyan government building following the revolution.

After their rendition to Tripoli, Belhaj and his wife, along with other members of opposition groups, were allegedly tortured by Libyan authorities.

Belhaj, who is seeking damages in court and a formal apology, has said he will settle with the British government for just £3.