University bosses call Labour’s student tuition fees cut ‘implausible’
The opposition party has yet to officially unveil the policy, but Labour party leader Ed Miliband has said previously he is in favor of lowering the cap, which was raised to £9,000 ($13,500) by the coalition government in 2010.
In a letter to The Times, vice-chancellors from the board of Universities UK said reducing the fee cap would leave universities £10 billion ($15 billion) worse off over the next five years.
The letter warned that the effects of a lowered cap would also have repercussions throughout the whole economy.
The proposals would lead to “cuts to universities that would damage the economy, affect the quality of students' education, and set back work on widening access to higher education.”
The letter, written by Sir Christopher Snowden, vice-chancellor of the University of Surrey, and signed by members of Universities UK, said that instead of making fees lower the government should provide better support to students from poorer backgrounds by increasing the levels of living allowances.
They said the planned policy “risks the equality of education for all.”
“Any move to limit the number of students attending universities as a way of reducing costs would remove opportunities for young people and those seeking to return to education, and act as a barrier to economic growth,” the letter reads.
It adds that Labour had “missed the point,” saying “this is purely a pragmatic issue, that a policy is evolving on the hoof which is not really a practical policy going forward and the potential damage is colossal.”
Critics of the policy say that lowering the fee cap would leave universities at the mercy of government funding and more vulnerable to cuts.
There has also been mixed reaction from steadfast campaigners for free education, who, in parts, echo Snowden’s sentiment that Labour’s plans do not tackle the root of the tuition fee problem.
Speaking to RT, Deborah Hermanns, from the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts, called the policy “cynical,” suggesting that Labour was turning the need for a different funding system into a populist policy.
“The proposal for a graduate tax and the plan to cut tuition fees from £9,000 to £6,000, in a year where the student movement has reignited the fight for free education, shows that Labour is cynically latching on to the clear want and need for a different funding system.”
“However, it is not the funding system that we are asking for: we will not stop until we win free education, funded not by a graduate tax but by progressive taxation,” Hermanns added.
Reaction to the mooted Labour proposal has been mixed, with both critics and supporters weighing in on social media. Some argue those paying a higher rate of fees should be given compensation if fees are reduced for new students.
If #Labour are thinking of £6K c.f. £9K tuition fees, what happens to those who've been paying over last few years? I'd vote for reduction.
— Clare (@cjsbella) February 2, 2015
— As a Bad Guy (@JinaduOladimeji) February 2, 2015
Others say the aim of the policy is misguided and won’t directly benefit students.
Labour's £6000 tuition fees may help psychologically but only those STARTING on salaries £34k+ (& growing after) gain http://t.co/215f3YAMbL
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) February 2, 2015
One can see why Miliband wants to do something about tuition fees but Univs right: subsistence is the bigger problem. pic.twitter.com/lyNj8gi78E
— White Wednesday (@WhiteWednesday) February 2, 2015
The 2010 increase to tuition fees was a blow to Deputy PM and Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, who had promised to defend free education before the election but later switched to supporting the £9,000 tuition fee after he joined the Tory-led coalition government.
When asked recently on Channel 4’s The Last Leg: “How sh***y do you feel about what you did with the tuition fees?” by commentator Charlie Brooker, Clegg said on a scale of one to 10, he was probably at “nine-and-a-half.”