President Obama, tear down this wall of fear!
The cloud now hanging over America’s national mood is more understandable when we consider the escalation of events over the past decade. Somewhere between the clunky bookends of the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 and Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations of 2013, the United States began to appear less of a democratic superpower and more a repressive kingdom of fear, a neurotic empire of anxiety that trusts nobody, least of all itself.
Despite efforts to blame America’s slow-motion nervous breakdown on the Great Recession of 2008, that diagnosis shoots wide of the mark. Nevertheless, it can’t be denied that the government’s massive bailout of the bankers and corporations has created a level of political cynicism throughout America - and the world - that lacks historic parallels. At the very least, it rammed home the ugly truth that politicians are more comfortable in bed with corporate lobbyists than in Congress defending the rights of the taxpayers.
With that said, the current level of fear and loathing now weighing down American society did not take root at the local level. Instead, the fear seems to have trickled down from above, perspiration rolling down Washington's brow, so to speak, soaking the grassroots. The smell of fear is real, scientists say, and being scared is contagious.
In fact, the cornerstone in the foundation of our ‘Kingdom of
Fear’ (the title of a 2003 book on the subject of America’s
rising police state by the late Hunter S. Thompson) was set in
place following the 9/11 terror attacks, when the entire nation
was consumed by legitimate fear.
Although George W. Bush said Osama bin Laden attacked America because he “hated our freedoms,” the self-proclaimed ‘war president’ gave the Al-Qaeda leader exactly what he hoped to achieve by attacking America in the first place. With no loss of irony or shame, the Neocons opportunistically used the chaos of 9/11 as a convenient smokescreen to crack down on hard-fought civil liberties enshrined in the US Constitution.
The 363-page PATRIOT Act (introduced on October 23, the bill passed the next day by House members, many of whom were anxious over mysterious letters containing anthrax arriving in the mailboxes of some congressmen. Michael Moore in his controversial film Fahrenheit 9/11 records Congressman Jim McDermott alleging that no Senator had time to read the bill) surrendered a number of draconian powers to the federal government, including the indefinite military detention of Americans; the ability to search a home or business without the owner’s consent or knowledge; the power to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order; and access to business records, including library and financial records.
The argument that there has been a nearly seamless transition between the Bush and Obama administrations got a boost on May 26, 2011 when the Democratic leader used an Autopen (in France!) to sign off on a four-year extension of three key provisions in the PATRIOT Act: roving wiretaps, searches of business and library records, and conducting surveillance of ‘lone wolves’ - individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to terrorist groups. Many rightly argue that the Bush-Obama tag team is casting the domestic security net a bit too wide and deep, and risks catching many innocent people in the haul.
Obama himself, however, is to blame for delivering the coup de'
grace to American liberties when he won the right to indefinitely
detain US citizens and foreigners under the National Defense
Authorization Act of 2012. Today, every American is a potential
terrorist, and we are treated as guilty until proven innocent.
But this marked just the early stages of America’s new Kingdom of Fear, as reports of other abuses of power began trickling in from around the globe. Due to space limitations, here is the abridged version: The 2003 invasion of Iraq, a sovereign nation that had no proven weapons of mass destruction, as asserted by the Bush administration, nor did the late Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein, assist Al-Qaeda in the attacks of 9/11; the human rights abuses at Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp (Gitmo), which saw detainees, many of whom have been cleared of their charges, forced to wear sensory deprivation garb, i.e. blindfolds and earmuffs, despite the fact that Gitmo sits on a corner of communist Cuba, is surrounded by shark-infested waters, not to mention barbed wire and US troops. Obama’s promise on his first campaign trail to shutter the “GULAG of our times” and give the detainees civil trials on American soil was fiercely contested by ex-Vice President Dick Cheney and today, despite the occasional hunger strike, the facility remains open for business, while the detainees are subjected to the whims of a kangaroo military tribunal; CIA ‘black sites’ in Eastern Europe, where detainees in the ‘War on Terror’ were hauled away for ‘enhanced interrogation,’ a euphemistic term for waterboarding and other such medieval pleasantries.
All of the above atrocities were pulled off by a non-stop
fear-mongering campaign that has not applied the brakes since
Meanwhile, a strange transformation has come over the Land of Liberty since the attacks of Sept 11: The American people, as opposed to the wily terrorists, are quickly becoming the main focus of the emperor’s attention. This should not be considered a positive thing.
In addition to the indefinite military detention of Americans,
the US military is paving the way for bypassing Posse
Comitatus, the 1878 law that forbids the US military from
being used in domestic law enforcement. A recent Department of
Defense instruction gives the green light for US troops to quell
“civil disturbances” domestically without any presidential
authorization (the site of armored vehicles and what amounted to
martial law on the streets following the Boston Marathon bombing
did little to inspire confidence among those paying attention,
who see a definite move toward the militarization of America’s
police forces). What better way to employ all those military
personnel returning home from their tours in Afghanistan and Iraq
than to assign them positions in local police forces?
But wait, it gets better. In addition to overwhelming police force being used to patrol Main Street, USA, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is in the process of hoarding some 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition – much of it in the form of hollow-point rounds, which are specifically banned in international warfare. (If ever there was a reason to defend the Second Amendment this is certainly it. As one well-known commentator put it: "The answer to 1984 is 1776!") It’s important to remember that this massive stockpiling of guns and ammo is not designed to be used in some foreign battlefield, since the DHS was created specifically for guarding the homeland.
While some people may think this bullet-hoarding is no big deal,
consider this factoid: At the height of the Iraq War, the US Army
was firing less than 6 million rounds a month. In other
words, 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition would be enough to
sustain a war – on American soil - for over 20 years. Does that
sound right? Will all those bullets just be used for target
practice? Is it just coincidence that at the very moment the
anti-gun movement is gaining traction among some US politicians,
including US Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the DHS is
busy buying up enough ammunition to outlast many generations of
Unfortunately, it’s not just bullets that the DHS is busy
stockpiling, but armored personnel carriers being repatriated
from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. According to
“paramilblogger” Ken Jorgustin who wrote last September: “These MRAPs are
being seen the US streets all across America, by verified
observers with photos, videos, and descriptions.
Regardless of the exact number of MRAP’s being delivered to DHS, why would they need such over-the-top vehicles on US streets to withstand IEDs, mine blasts, and 50 caliber hits to bullet-proof glass? In a war zone… yes, definitely. Let’s protect our men and women. On the streets of America?”
Ralph Benko, a contributor to Forbes, called the DHS accumulating such over-the-top military equipment “wrong in every way.”
“President Obama has an opportunity, now, to live up to some of his rhetoric by helping the federal government set a noble example in a matter very close to his heart (and that of his progressive base), one not inimical to the Bill of Rights: gun control. The federal government can, for a nice change, begin practicing what it preaches by controlling itself.”
However, since the terror attacks of 9/11, the last thing America
seems able to do is “control itself.” This was obvious by
the activities of the National Security Agency (NSA) made public
by whistleblower, Edward Snowden, with the cooperation of Guardian reporter, Glenn
Although some level of spying should be expected by every government, the level of surveillance that the NSA was conducting on practically every corner of the planet, with absolutely no distinction being made between friends and enemies, simply boggles the mind. Although a follower of Machiavellian political philosophy may smile at such ruthless actions, little consideration seems to have been given to the consequences of getting caught with a hand in the proverbial cookie jar.
As more information about the NSA’s activities becomes more available with practically each passing week, it would be an understatement to say the revelations have been an embarrassment for the United States. Not only was the NSA’s PRISM program collecting the meta-data on millions of people, it was monitoring the mobile telephones of some 35 world leaders.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who, according to Reuters, suspected her phone was being tapped after discovering her personal number written on a US document, did not mince her words during a phone call to President Obama.
"The [German] federal government, as a close ally and partner
of the US, expects in the future a clear contractual basis for
the activity of the services and their co-operation," she
told the US leader.
Although the Vatican, which was also the target of US phone monitoring, may be counted on to forgive Washington for its many transgressions, it remains to be seen if the rest of the world will be so understanding.
Clearly, it’s time for the United States to give up the worldwide
Robert Bridge is the author of the book, Midnight in the American Empire, which
discusses the dangerous consequences of extreme corporate power
in the United States today.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.