icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

No, men don’t create more climate emissions – but woke journalists and Swedish feminists fill the world with toxic propaganda 

No, men don’t create more climate emissions – but woke journalists and Swedish feminists fill the world with toxic propaganda 
Once again, gender warriors in Sweden and politically motivated hacks are spreading feminist lies, blaming men for climate change because they ‘spend more on food and cars’. This nonsense is worse than any greenhouse gas.

Is there anything that isn’t men’s fault? In the addled minds of hateful feminists, we are to blame for everything that’s imperfect in society – and deserve no credit for anything that’s good. 

It’s been this way since the 1960s, when crazed gender activists first started banging on about ‘patriarchy’ and applying bizarre critical theories to age-old relationships between the sexes. 

Predictably, this sparked a war against masculinity, which has raged on ever since and was perhaps first defined when Valerie Solanas – founder of the Society for Cutting Up Men – shot Andy Warhol.

Amazingly, the premeditated attack, which took place in New York on June 3, 1968, didn’t kill him. He survived his wounds, despite the bullet ripping through his stomach, liver, spleen, esophagus and both lungs. 

Also on rt.com The floods in Germany show how fear-mongering about climate change is preventing us from combating actual disasters  

He was briefly declared dead at the scene, but then revived by paramedics and rushed to hospital, where he spent several weeks in intensive care. 

Discharged after two months, he was then forced to wear a corset for the rest of his life in order to keep his organs in place. He eventually died 19 years later – in part from complications of his appalling injuries.

In other words, feminism didn’t kill Andy Warhol immediately, but instead, it killed him slowly, over a long period of time. 

Now, some 50 years later, the same thing is happening again – but, this time, it’s the male psyche that’s being targeted. And, instead of ballistics, they’re using political propaganda, which they hope will destabilize masculinity, spark a cultural coup and allow women to inherit the Earth.  

I appreciate that sounds like a crazed conspiracy theory, but the evidence is everywhere.

Don’t believe me? Go and see for yourself. Open any newspaper, magazine or website and see the psychological warfare and the mind games. The encouragement to surrender our will and self-respect will be obvious. 

The latest example of this is the ludicrous and sexist claim that men cause more climate emissions than women. 

According to so-called experts from Sweden, we spend more on petrol, eat more meat and go on greater numbers of long-haul trips. 

Whatever the claims, it’s merely the foregone conclusion of the latest ‘study’ by research company Ecoloop, which – surprise, surprise – is run by feminists with an agenda.

Also on rt.com As Greta’s NZ followers declare their ‘racism’, it’s clear that showing white guilt is more important than saving the planet

“We think it’s important to take the difference between men and women into account in policy making,” said Annika Carlsson Kanyama, who led the ‘research’.

“The way they spend is very stereotypical – women spend more money on home decoration, health and clothes and men spend more money on fuel for cars, eating out, alcohol and tobacco.”

My response? F**k right off.

Like most sane people, I am sick of the endless hatred and criticism of men, who have built Western civilization from scratch and repeatedly protected it by sacrificing their lives on battlefields.

Besides, let’s have a reality check on who are the worst offenders regarding climate change... 

  • It’s women who destroy the ozone with their hairspray and perfumes. It’s women whose soiled sanitary products end up in the oceans or creating fatbergs in our sewers that men, not women, are forced to remove. 
  • It’s predominately women’s vain consumption of trashy fashion magazines, such as Vogue and Cosmopolitan, plus endless chick-lit books that cause rainforest trees to be chopped down, pulped and made into paper. According to the World Wildlife Federation, a chunk of forest the size of a football pitch is felled every two seconds for this purpose. So why don’t women stop buying crap books such as ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’? As of October 2017, that series had shifted 150 million copies, which is a lot of trees.
  • Greta Thunberg, who is female, constantly travels the world, which suggests she has a carbon footprint far bigger than the average teenage boy. 
  • But, more than anything else, it’s exclusively women who keep giving birth to babies, despite the fact we live in an over-populated world.
Also on rt.com Brussels’ new climate plan will cause job losses and mass protests, and might even bring down the EU itself

Adding to this is the fact that, because of the gendered life expectancy gap, there are far more women alive than men. This means that more women are discarding crap into landfills, more women are failing to recycle and more women are consuming fossil fuel energy, such as gas and electricity. 

Given that humans – not animals – are plundering Earth’s resources, and women are the majority of humans on Earth, perhaps the blame lies with them, not us. 

Then again, if the planet does get destroyed and we all die, it won’t be all bad: at least we won’t have to listen to man-hating feminists and their endless attempts to shoot us down.

You know, just like Andy Warhol.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.