icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
5 Mar, 2018 13:17

The great US disinformation double standard

The great US disinformation double standard

The Trump administration is launching yet another offensive aimed primarily at Russia, this time adding tens of millions of dollars to a State Department budget to undertake a major disinformation campaign.

It will be doing the very thing it has accused the Russian government – without any convincing evidence to date – of doing in an attempt to sway opinions of American citizens most recently in the 2016 US presidential elections. 

The allegation has led to US indictments of 13 Russians supposedly for using nothing more than social media without any evidence of tampering with the election process. To launch this offensive disinformation effort, the Defense Department will provide some $40 million to the State Department's budget for its so-called Global Engagement Center, or GEC.

The GEC originally was created during the Obama administration to counter foreign terrorist and extremist group propaganda. However, the GEC's mandate has been expanded to counter what the State Department perceives to be calculated disinformation initiatives of foreign state and non-state actors and individuals.

The GEC will award millions of dollars in grants from its Information Access Fund to yet unspecified public and private outlets, which will include "society groups, media content providers, non-governmental organizations, federally-funded research and development centers, private companies and academic institutions," according to a State Department statement.

The effort will have all the appearances of an aggressive disinformation campaign of its own without public oversight, launched by a myriad of unidentified entities that undoubtedly will be aimed at the internal affairs of other countries.

"The funding is critical to ensuring that we continue to malign influence and disinformation and that we can leverage deeper partnerships with our allies, Silicon Valley and other partners in this fight,"said. Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy Steve Goldstein. "It is not merely a defensive posture that we should take. We also need to be on the offensive."

The US government will be conducting disinformation warfare, doing what it accuses others of doing, presumably under the auspices of the American intelligence services. In effect, the GEC could become a front for funneling funds to the intelligence community to orchestrate a massive disinformation initiative through private entities without any public oversight.

Such an effort would constitute an aggressive form of not only disinformation but also cyberwarfare that the US accuses others of doing.

Interfering in US elections isn't the same as the US doing it in other countries, according to Ashton Carter, a former secretary of defense during the Obama administration. Really?

Carter was speaking at the recent World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. He tried to make a far-fetched distinction between the US launching disinformation and cyberattacks on other countries, and others doing it to the US.

"We conduct espionage on the internet," Carter tried to explain. "And when we're spied on, I don't complain. I am unhappy with it because I wish we had not had our secrets stolen. But I put it into a different category. Covert action... is not espionage. It has the effect of harming."

However, examples of overt and covert US disinformation and cyberattacks on other countries are legion.

The US intervened in the internal affairs of Russia following the collapse of the Soviet Union, during the administration of Bill Clinton.

During the presidency of Boris Yeltsin, the US sent advisers into Russia acting as being "nothing less than missionary – a virtual crusade to transform post-communist Russia into some facsimile of the American democratic and capitalistic system," according to American scholar Stephen F. Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian studies at Princeton University and New York University.

"Political missionaries and evangelists, usually called 'advisers,' spread across Russia in the early 1990s," Cohen said, adding that it was all funded by the US government.

The effort was a bust, making Yeltsin very unpopular.

This isn't the only example of US intervention in the internal affairs of another country, even fledgling democracies.

At the hands of the Central Intelligence Agency, the US upset Italian elections, such as the one in 1948.

The CIA also was instrumental in the 1953 coup of Iranian President Mohammad Mosaddeq, "carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy," the agency now admits.

Then there is the 1973 overthrow of democratically-elected Chilean President Salvador Allende and establishment of the ruthless dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet.

In 2015, the US initiated the violent overthrow of democratically-elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.

The US can't have it both ways by waging what is a double standard. The increased funding of the GEC with the intelligence services going on a new offensive of disinformation and cyberattacks will only exasperate an already geopolitically tumultuous world.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.