Space war between US & Russia will trap humanity on Earth, no matter who wins – analysts
"I'm fully confident we could win a conflict in space today" against Russia, China or any other adversary, Shanahan told US senators, who are deciding if he's fit to take on the job on a permanent basis.
When asked to comment on this ambitious statement, Bruce Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space, remembered the words of US astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who was the sixth person to walk on the moon.Also on rt.com Russia warns US against arms race on Earth & space after missile defense plans revealed
"Years ago, I organized a protest at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida and one of the speakers was Mitchell. And he said if there's one war in space – it'll be the last because so much space junk will be created by blowing up the satellites that we won't be able to get a rocket off Earth anymore. It just won't be able to get through this 'minefield.'"
However, the acting defense secretary's words "are really not new" as Washington had been talking about controlling and dominating space since the days of President Ronald Reagan back in the 1980s, Gagnon told RT.
"The US sees space as another fighting domain. They have a slogan, reading 'full spectrum dominance' and what this means is that the US military should control a conflict at every level – on the ground, in the ocean, in the air and now in space."
The activist praised Russia and China for their decades-long effort to promote Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS), regretting that "the US and Israel keep blocking that treaty at the UN."
"Russia and China have been saying: 'Let's close the door to the barn before the horse gets out.' But the US refuses as its weapons corporations are committed to making huge money off a new arms race in space."
Military expert from the Russian magazine Arsenal Otechestva, Aleksey Leonkov, said Shanahan's bravado is nothing but a "propagandist move."
"The question is – with what hardware exactly is the US going to achieve this victory?" he wondered.
What they have in space is only surveillance satellites. That's it.
The analyst recalled that US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) marked three perspective directions in developing military space technologies back in 2002. "They were space interceptors, which would eliminate ballistic missiles; space platforms with powerful lasers, most likely nuclear powered, to protect the US territory; and special systems to strike targets on Earth with space-to-surface missiles."Also on rt.com Weaponizing space & dreams of new tech: US missile defense review in a nutshell
According to Leonkov, "none of these American projects is even close to practical implementation" at the moment.
Unlike the US, "Russia has recently developed a real military laser system and possesses technologies to deliver it to orbit," he said. And if Soviet experience in the field is restored, "it'll all be fine" for Russia.
"The USSR produced several space military systems and even tested them. One of them was the R-36ORB missile, which was able to remain in orbit as a satellite and hit a target on the ground on command from the control center. This system was even on combat duty until 1993. We also had Almaz space battle stations that could tackle spacecraft and ballistic missiles."
China is also a strong competitor, as it already has "anti-satellite and anti-missile systems in orbit," while actively developing its manned space program, Leonkov said.Also on rt.com ‘Possible misinformation’: Analyst calls US bluff on imminent test of ‘DEATH RAY’ with ‘tiny’ budget
The US is only trying to “start catching up” in the race of space war systems development, as their own technologies are in “infant stage,” former Pentagon official Michael Maloof told RT.
“The technology in many respects still needs to be developed … The US does not have an anti-missile system that can be launched from Earth that would be capable of hitting missiles or satellites that are in orbit beyond 150 miles,” he said.
“There’s an open discussion of trying to get the next-generation technology going because they’re watching, primarily, the hypersonic missile development of Russia and China and also an increase in technology breakthroughs that China is achieving.”
Maloof explained that Shanahan’s statement, more than anything, was about bringing attention to the Pentagon’s need to develop space war capabilities – a process which could drag on for years.
“They’re trying to get the dialogue going now because it’s going to take forever to get Congress [to] go along with it and start appropriating money for it. There’ve got to be hearings, there’ve got to be discussions, it’s got to be budgeted for – and research and development, it’s going to take years.”Also on rt.com May the force be with you: US Air Force turns to sci-fi classics for program names
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!