Names of ‘Russian suspects’ in Skripal case published by UK don’t mean anything to us – Moscow
The Foreign Ministry reacted to the news, saying the UK’s accusations over alleged involvement in the Salisbury and Amesbury incidents were groundless.
“Names as well as photos [of the suspects] published in the media don’t mean anything to us,” Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for the ministry, said later in the day. She said Moscow is calling on London “to abandon making public accusations and media manipulations” and opt instead for “practical cooperation between law enforcement agencies.”
The Kremlin also dismissed London’s claims by saying that the data the British authorities presented are “incomprehensible.” “We have just heard or seen two names but these names mean nothing to me personally,” the Russian president’s aide, Yury Ushakov, said.
He further added that the UK police themselves admitted that “these names were apparently aliases.” “I don’t understand why this was done and what sort of signal the British side is sending. It is difficult to understand,” Ushakov said.
Moscow’s response came after UK prosecutors named two “Russian nationals” they said were involved in poisoning the Skripals. The two men, identified as Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, were charged in absentia with the attempted murder of the ex-double agent and his daughter, along with a police officer.
British police claimed the suspects entered the UK on valid Russian passports and had arrived in the country days before the incident. The men were traveling under aliases but were around 40-years-old, according to Neil Basu, the head of Counter Terrorism policing.
Sue Hemming, director of Legal Services at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) also said UK authorities have issued national and European arrest warrants for the two suspects. She noted British law enforcement agencies would not seek their extradition from Russia as its constitution forbids transfer of its own nationals to authorities in other jurisdictions.
The story comes on the back of a report by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) which stated that the chemical agent which poisoned a couple in Amesbury in June was identical to the one used to poison the Skripals in March. The report, however, did not mention the name ‘Novichok’ and did not refer to Russia.
The British announcement ignited reactions on social media, with users jokingly comparing the looks of the suspects to characters featured in Red Heat, a 1988 American action film directed by Walter Hill.
Meanwhile, Russian diplomats said the British accusations make little sense in light of the OPCW report. Alexander Shulgin, Moscow’s envoy to the international body, said earlier in the day that the UK failed to cooperate with Russia under the terms of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).
“If a member state has a question for another member state, as the UK does for Russia in the Skripal and Amesbury cases, there’s a consultation procedure for this,” he said, adding, “if the British don’t want to reach us, then there is technical secretariat and other OPCW divisions.”
Former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found unconscious in Salisbury in March. The poisoning sparked a diplomatic row between the UK and Russia, with the British government accusing Moscow of being behind the attack.
Russia has consistently denied any involvement in the incident and offered to assist in the investigation, but so far this offer has not been taken up by the UK authorities.
Subscribe to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you.