'Web-sharing censored!' Activists unite to 'Save the Link' from restrictive laws
Dozens of companies from over 20 countries have joined the campaign, along with over 25,000 people so far, in an effort to push back against the “powerful media conglomerates,” who want people to become liable for merely linking to certain content.
“The web without links is like a world without roads,”states the coalition organized by the Canadian OpenMedia.ca.
— Martin Držka (@martindrzka) 7 мая 2015
All those who join sign a statement declaring the “right to link” a basic freedom.
“Linking is the foundation of the Web. We oppose regulations that aim to censor links to content or otherwise penalize services that utilize hyperlinks,” the statement reads.
— Julia O'Dwyer (@jrodwyer) 6 мая 2015
The campaign has been launched as countries around the world consider implementing various online restrictions.
— Jens Grochtdreis (@Flocke) 7 мая 2015
One of the biggest concerns at this point is with EU legislators, who are reviewing copyright laws and debating over 500 amendments to the European Union’s Copyright Directive. Their decisions could potentially hinder the right to share links freely.
“The link censorship amendments being considered could restrict the online expression of internet users around the world. These amendments are out-of-step with our crowdsourced plan for free expression online that over 300,000 people around the world contributed to,” OpenMedia Campaigns Coordinator Meghan Sali said in a press release.
For instance, an amendment proposed by French MEP Virginie Rozière and Luxembourgish Mady Delvaux states: “This option must be strictly limited to links which lead to freely available content; [and] observes that the online intermediaries liability regime applicable to links to illicit content should be tightened up, particularly by revising the e-commerce directive.”
— Creative Commons (@creativecommons) 6 мая 2015
A proposal by the British MEP Mary Honeyball stresses that “under certain circumstances, embedding and linking may be prejudicial to the rights of the creator.”
Another amendment from the Bulgarian and UK MEPs Angel Dzhambazki and Sajjad Karim argues “the importance of enhanced user information regarding obligations for anyone who knowingly provides hyperlinks to unauthorized content or links that circumvent paywalls.”
All of the above amendments are in regard to the MEP Julia Reda’s report on the revision of the European copyright directive. Reda’s original draft was largely popular with the Save the Link campaigners because it affirmed the freedom to link.
The draft “stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public.”
Sali said that while Reda’s proposals were “sensible and forward-thinking,” some of the amendments proposed by MEPs were “frankly irresponsible.”
“If implemented, these extreme amendments would undermine the Right to Link and ruin the internet as we know it,” the activist warned.
Aside from the EU’s amendments, Germany’s ‘ancillary copyright’ rule restricts how others can link to their news websites, basically, forcing search engines and news sharing websites to acquire licenses for links, which is similar to a ‘link tax’.
A similar law has been adopted in Spain, forcing the shutdown of the popular Google News service due to the introduced fees for companies that link to external content.
Meanwhile, in the US and Canada, local courts have been employed to force search engines to erase or block content domestically and sometimes even globally. Australia is also looking at blocking hyperlinks leading to popular sites linking to legal shared content.