icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
25 Jun, 2014 17:06

France closer to legal euthanasia? Doctor acquitted after giving lethal injections

France closer to legal euthanasia? Doctor acquitted after giving lethal injections

French emergency physician, Nicolas Bonnemaison, who faced life in prison, has been acquitted of poisoning charges after he helped seven terminally ill patients to die.

The doctor’s lawyer, Benoit Ducos-Ader, said that the decision was "huge" and added that he hoped the move would be significant in the debate in France on legalizing euthanasia. During the trial, he urged the jurors to “accelerate the history” of legislation.

The trial was very emotional, with relatives of several patients testifying in court in the doctor’s defense. Bonnemaison himself spoke out during his six-minute final speech, saying that it “is part of the duty of the physician to accompany patients through to the end.”

The jurors answered all 14 questions negatively, thus clearing Bonnemaison of all charges, according to Le Monde.
The lawyers called the emergency doctor to “put his white coat back on again.”

Following the announcement of the verdict, taken after four hours of deliberation, the room cheered, while Bonnemaison stood smiling, hand in hand with his lawyer, AFP reported.

"This case reinforces the need to develop our legislative framework," confirmed government spokesman Stéphane Le Foll.

The 53-year-old doctor appeared in court over the deaths of seven terminally ill patients back in 2010-11, and he admitted culpability.

“They haunt me day and night,” Bonnemaison said three years ago.

On Tuesday, the Advocate General had asked for a suspended sentence of five years, considering that the accused “had acted sincerely.”

People dressed as the traditionnal theatre character "Pierrot" hold placards reading "Urgency is to solidarity" as they take part in a demonstration against euthanasia for elderly and dependent people on June 24, 2014 on the Trocadero esplanade, also called the Parvis of Human Rights, near the Eiffel Tower in Paris. (AFP Photo/Fred Dufour)

Euthanasia is currently legal in Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, but not in France. A 2005 law by Jean Leonetti prohibits assisted suicide, but grey areas remain in the law regarding the more passive euthanasia forms. Part of François Hollande’s presidential platform was a pledge to introduce new right-to-die legislation.

The Bonnemaison trial gave an opportunity to question Leonetti’s law on the end of life. Leonetti, who represents the center-right UMP party at the National Assembly, was at the trial last week.

"Nobody wants to see Dr. Bonnemaison in prison. I said in court that, in my eyes, he was not a murderer. I see that these words were echoed by the prosecutor. It does mean that we are sympathetic towards him," he said on France Inter on Tuesday morning.

"At the same time, let us ask the question: are we going to give the doctors the right to administer death to patients who have not requested it - without discussing it with anyone? <…> Could the power of life and death be given to medicine that is already very powerful?” he added.

The court’s ruling follows the decision of the European Court of Human Rights to continue the life of Vincent Lambert, a quadriplegic in a vegetative state for six years and whose relatives can’t decide his fate. A day before that, France's top administrative court had ordered an end to the comatose man’s treatment.

Meanwhile, in the UK, the Supreme Court upheld the ban on assisted suicide on Wednesday. Still the judges ruled that the current law is incompatible with human rights legislation, which means it may soon be up for legal debate.