TPP Uncovered: WikiLeaks releases draft of highly-secretive multi-national trade deal
The anti-secrecy group
published on Wednesday a 95-page excerpt taken from
a recent draft of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, a
NAFTA-like agreement that is expected to encompass nations
representing more than 40 percent of the world’s gross domestic
product when it is finally approved: the United States, Japan,
Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru,
Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei.
US President Barack Obama and counterparts from 11 other prospective member states have been hammering out the free trade agreement in utmost secrecy for years now, the result of which, according to the White House, would rekindle the economies of all of those involved, including many countries considered to still be emerging.
“The TPP will boost our economies, lowering barriers to trade and investment, increasing exports and creating more jobs for our people, which is my number-one priority,” Obama said during a Nov. 2011 address. The deal, he said, “has the potential to be a model not only for the Asia Pacific but for future trade agreements” by regulating markets and creating opportunities for small and medium-sized businesses in the growing global marketplace.
Upon the publication of an excerpt obtained by WikiLeaks this week, however, opponents of the act are insisting that provisions dealing with creation, invention and innovation could serve a severe blow to everyone, particularly those the internet realm.
Although the TPP covers an array of topics — many of which have
not been covered by past agreements, according to Obama —
WikiLeaks has published a chapter from a draft dated August 30,
2013 that deals solely on Intellectual Property, or IP, rights.
Previous reports about the rumored contents of the TPP with
regards to IP law have raised concern among activists before,
with the California-based Electronic Frontier Foundation going as
far as to warn that earlier leaked draft text suggested the
agreement “would have extensive negative ramifications for
users’ freedom of speech, right to privacy and due process and
hinder peoples' abilities to innovate,” all of which is being
agreed upon without any oversight or observation. Indeed, the
thousands of words released by WikiLeaks this week has concreted
those fears and has already caused the likes of the EFF and
others to sound an alarm.
The newly leaked TPP text confirms it's a serious threat to users' rights. Help us stop it: https://t.co/JEfZ5SNMhJ— EFF (@EFF) November 13, 2013
The IP chapter, wrote WikiLeaks, “provides the public with the fullest opportunity so far to familiarize themselves with the details and implications of the TPP,” an agreement that has largely avoided scrutiny in the mainstream media during its development, no thanks, presumably, to the under-the-table arguments that have led prospective member states to the point they’re at today.
Julian Assange, the Australian founder of the whistleblower site who has been confined to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for over a year now, had particularly harsh words for the TPP in a statement published alongside the draft release.
“If instituted, the TPP’s IP regime would trample over individual rights and free expression, as well as ride roughshod over the intellectual and creative commons,” Assange said. “If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs.”
Within the IP chapter, the partaking nations in one excerpt agree
to “Enhance the role of intellectual property in promoting
economic and social development,” but elsewhere suggest that
the way in which such could be accomplished would involve serious
policing of the World Wide Web. Later, the countries write they
hope to “reduce impediments to trade and investment by
promoting deeper economic integration through effective and
adequate creation, utilization, protection and enforcement of
intellectual property rights, taking into account the different
levels of economic development and capacity as well as
differences in national legal systems.”
Opponents have argued in the past that stringent new rules under the TPP with regards to copyrighted material would cause the price of medication to go up: potentially catastrophic news for residents of member state who may have difficulties affording prescriptions. Public Citizen, a Washington-based consumer advocacy organization, has warned that US Trade Representatives privy to the TPP discussions have demanded provisions that “would strengthen, lengthen and broaden pharmaceutical monopolies on cancer, heart disease and HIV/AIDS drugs, among others, in the Asia-Pacific region.” Indeed, the leaked chapter suggests drug companies could easily extend and widen patents under the TPP, prohibiting other countries from producing life-saving pills and selling them for less. Outside of the world of medicine, though, the implications that could come with new copyright rules agreed upon my essentially half of the world’s economy are likely to affect everyone.
"One could see the TPP as a Christmas wish-list for major corporations, and the copyright parts of the text support such a view," Dr. Matthew Rimmer, an expert in intellectual property law, told the Sydney Morning Herald. "Hollywood, the music industry, big IT companies such as Microsoft and the pharmaceutical sector would all be very happy with this."
WikiLeaks wrote in response that the enforcement measures discussed have “far-reaching implications for individual rights, civil liberties, publishers, internet service providers and internet privacy, as well as for the creative, intellectual, biological and environmental commons.”
“Particular measures proposed include supranational litigation tribunals to which sovereign national courts are expected to defer, but which have no human rights safeguards,” warned WikiLeaks. “The TPP IP Chapter states that these courts can conduct hearings with secret evidence.”
According to the whistleblower site, the IP chapter also includes provisions that rehash some of the very surveillance and enforcement rules from the abandoned SOPA and ACTA treaties that were left to die after public outrage halted any agreement with regards to those legislation.
“The WikiLeaks text also features Hollywood and recording
industry inspired proposals – think about the SOPA debacle – to
limit internet freedom and access to educational materials, to
force internet providers to act as copyright enforcers and to cut
off people’s internet access,” Burcu Kilic, an intellectual
property lawyer with Public Citizen, explained to the website
SOPA, or the Stop Online Privacy Act, was abandoned last year after massive public campaign thwarted the US Congress’ attempt to censor access to certain internet sites where copyrighted content may be incidentally hosted. One of the bill’s biggest opponents, Kim Dotcom of file-sharing sites Megaupload and Mega, was quick to condone WikiLeaks for their release of the TPP draft and condemned those responsible for drafting a bill that he warned would have major consequences for all if approved, including residents of New Zealand such as himself.
“No wonder they kept it secret. What a malicious piece of US corporate lobbying. TPP is about world domination for US corporations. Nothing else. We will stop this madness in New Zealand,” he told RT’s Andrew Blake.
According to WikiLeaks, the Obama administration and senior heads of state from other potential TPP nations have expressed interest in ratifying the agreement before 2014. All of that could now be put in jeopardy.