icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
24 Jul, 2013 16:16

White House denounces Amash amendment as dismantling of NSA

White House denounces Amash amendment as dismantling of NSA

On the eve of a congressional discussion that may lend to ending the National Security Agency’s mass collection of domestic phone records, the White House made the rare move late Tuesday of issuing a statement condemning proposed legislation.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday evening that a bipartisan-supported amendment expected to go before a vote later this week would “hastily dismantle” a key counterterrorism tool used by the United States intelligence community if approved.

The amendment, authored by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Michigan) and supported by democratic colleague Rep. John Conyers, would forbid the NSA from further interpreting Section 215 of the Patriot Act in the manner that has allowed the agency to routinely collect the daily phone records of millions of Americans for the past several years.

The proposal, wrote Amash, “Ends authority for the blanket collection of records under the Patriot Act” and “Bars the NSA and other agencies from using Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect records, including telephone call records, that pertain to persons who are not subject to an investigation under Section 215.”

Responding to the White House’s remark, Amash wrote on Twitter, “When's the last time a president put out an emergency statement against an amendment? The Washington elites fear liberty. They fear you.”

When's the last time a president put out an emergency statement against an amendment? The Washington elites fear liberty. They fear you.

— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) July 24, 2013

Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, the federal government can collect data on foreign citizens and, in the process, pick up the communications of Americans engaged in conversations where at least one party is located abroad. Leaked NSA documents published by the Guardian and Washington Post recently have revealed that the intelligence community collects more than just that, though, going as far as to put the telephony metadata of millions of Americans regularly in the hands of Uncle Sam even in the absence of probable cause thanks to FISA court orders reauthorized every 90 days.

Despite the blowback caused by the leaks, the FISA court confirmed last week that it has again reauthorized the program for the next three months. If Rep. Amash has his way, however, that could all soon end — and much to the chagrin of the White House.

Amash admitted earlier this week that the amendment has been accepted by the House Committee on Rules and would be debated in Washington, DC as early as Wednesday evening with a Thursday morning vote likely to occur. From there, approval in Congress would mean the Amash amendment would find its way tacked on to a Department of Defense appropriations bill that Congress would later be asked to authorize and, in turn, end the NSA surveillance program.

U.S. Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) (Mark Wilson/Getty Images/AFP)

But before lawmakers are even presented with an opportunity to discuss the amendment on the floor of Congress, Carney wrote late Tuesday that the White House will not be supporting Amash’s efforts.

In light of the recent unauthorized disclosures, the President has said that he welcomes a debate about how best to simultaneously safeguard both our national security and the privacy of our citizens,” Carney wrote. “However, we oppose the current effort in the House to hastily dismantle one of our Intelligence Community’s counterterrorism tools.”

This blunt approach is not the product of an informed, open or deliberative process,” added Carney. “We urge the House to reject the Amash Amendment, and instead move forward with an approach that appropriately takes into account the need for a reasoned review of what tools can best secure the nation.”

The attempt from the White House to influence this week’s vote marks a rare occasion in which the president’s press secretary has publically denounced a lawmaker’s legislative efforts ahead of discussion. It also comes but moments after Gen. Keith Alexander, the director of the NSA, held two closed-door meetings on the Hill to discuss the amendment with members of Congress.

"In advance of anticipated action on amendments to the DoD Appropriations bill, Ranking Member C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger of the House Intelligence Committee invites your Member to attend a question and answer session with General Keith B. Alexander of the National Security Agency," lawmakers was told early Tuesday.

According to the Guardian, Gen. Alexander then hosted two meetings that evening — one for Republicans and another for Democrats — in which only attendees with top-secret security clearances could hear the NSA’s side before the amendment goes to the floor.

After the NSA chief held his powwow with Republican members of Congress, Rep. Amash described the event to the Guardian as cordial but added, "I don't believe anyone's mind was changed one way or the other.”

Members of Congress, Amash tweeted early Wednesday, will have to answer a simple question: “Do you oppose blanket, suspicionless collection of all Americans' phone records?”

Today, Members of Congress will have to answer a simple Q: Do you oppose blanket, suspicionless collection of all Americans' phone records?

— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) July 24, 2013

Amash, 33, is the sixth youngest member of the House of Representatives. He was elected to the House in 2010 and is considered by his peers to be strongly libertarian. In 2011, Amash was instrumental in raising awareness of the National Defense Authorization Act before it went up for vote. It was ultimately approved and as a result authorized the government to indefinitely detain American citizens suspected of involvement in terrorism. In 2012, Amash co-authorized an amendment to the NDAA which would have ended the indefinite detention powers. That amendment was ultimately rejected.