icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
20 May, 2010 23:51

US candidates willing to say anything to get noticed

US political candidates appear to be throwing caution to the wind to get elected. Numerous candidates are producing negative advertisements, politically incorrect messages and attacking the establishment to get noticed.

Peter Loge of Milo Public Affairs said “there is some evidence that indicates negative advertising energizes your base. If it didn’t work, they wouldn’t do it.

America has a long history of negative political campaigning, going back as far as George Washington.

The American people just don’t like mean spiritedness, but if there’s a clever jab sometimes that can work really well,” said Loge.

Ads in American political campaigns have come to a point where the goal is to be highly controversial in order to achieve expanded free coverage in the media. This trend was exemplified visible in the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign against John Kerry in the 2004 US Presidential Election.

Social media is having a new impact on political ads, but so far it is unclear what that impact will be. 

Social media drives us to self-selection,” said Loge. “We may be seeing more online of what we’ve seen in the fragmentation of media,” said Loge, driven by self-selection based on personal preferences and biases, where individuals will seek out items that fit their interests.