icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Prosecutors hid reports that clear Manning? Judge orders release of new documents in WikiLeaks suspect's case

 Prosecutors hid reports that clear Manning? Judge orders release of new documents in WikiLeaks suspect's case
A US military judge ruled that WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning, 24, will have the right to access documents that prosecutors may have been hiding, which assess the effect of his crime on US national security.

The suspect’s defense lawyer’s claim that prosecutors were hiding reports by government agencies that could help Manning’s case. These reports, including assessments by the State Department, the FBI and the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive (Oncix), measured the impact that the leaked classified documents had on national security.Manning was arrested in May 2010 for having given classified government material to WikiLeaks. He faces charges for “aiding the enemy,” which is a capital offense.The defendant’s lawyer, David Coombs, believes the reports will prove that the release of the documents had no major effect on US national security. He has been requesting access to them for months.Among the classified material that Manning allegedly illegally gave to WikiLeaks were videos of a 2007 helicopter gun attack in Baghdad, the 2009 Granai airstrike in Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands of US diplomatic cables and half a million army reports (known as the “Afghan War logs”).Judge Denise Lind ruled that prosecutors must provide “damage assessment” reports from government agencies, measuring the impact of the classified material on WikiLeaks. On Monday the judge also ordered the prosecution to give an account of why it had refused to share all of the evidence with the defense.Prosecutors must now clarify when they became aware of the information they turned over to the defense, when they shared the files, what they were and how they gathered information for the assessment at the more than 60 government agencies they questioned.“It’s definitely heartening that David Coombs’ arguments are resonating with the judge,”said Zach Pesavento, a spokesman for the Bradley Manning support network.“The prosecution appears to have been deliberately misunderstanding its requirements to the defense.”If convicted, Manning could face life in prison, and the documents assessing his impact on national security could affect the remainder of the trial.

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.