icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Naked TSA protester protected by Constitution

Naked TSA protester protected by Constitution
If you ever want to strip down naked at Portland International Airport, congratulations — there’s now a legal precedent that puts you in the clear.

John Brennan, 50, was found not guilty this week over indecent exposure charges filed earlier this year. On April 17, Brennan was attempting to fly out of Portland International in the state of Oregon when a routine security screening raised a red flag. After a TSA agent allegedly identified traces of nitrate on Brennan’s body, the would-be passenger stripped off his clothes in what he says was an act of protest.“For me, time slowed down,” Brennan tells reporters. “I thought about nitrates and I thought about the Oklahoma City bombing.”Although agents with the Transportation Security Administration never actually called Mr. Brennan a terrorist, he felt that such was implied. Instead of arguing with the officers over what they did or didn’t find on his person, he figured he’d give them the go-ahead to inspect him inch by inch."When interviewed about his actions, Mr. Brennan stated he fly's (sic) a lot and had disrobed as a form of protest against TSA screeners who he felt were harassing him," reads the police report filed for the incident. "Mr. Brennan's actions caused two screening lanes to be closed and while some passengers covered their eyes and their children's eyes and moved away from the screening area, others stepped out of the screening lanes to look, laugh and take photos of Mr. Brennan.”Deputy District Attorney Joel Petersen had argued that the strip-down was an act of indecent exposure and nothing less, but for Brennan — and oddly enough, the judge — it was simply a very peculiar protest.“I was aware of the irony of removing my clothes to protect my privacy,” Mr. Brennan told the court from the witness stand on Wednesday. Following a brief hearing on Wednesday, Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge David Rees ruled that Brennan’s bizarre strip-down was indeed an act of protest, and therefore protected under the free speech clause in the US Constitution’s First Amendment. Petersen, the deputy DA, says he finds faults with the ruling. “Any person naked for any purpose will be able to say it was protected speech,” he tells the Associated Press. Brennan suggests, however, that the invasive searches made mandatory by the TSA does enough to discredit his constitutional rights as is.“I wanted to show them it's a two-way street,” he says. “I don't like a naked picture of me being available.”

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.